On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 14:13:42 +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
you can not generate that spec, because that will discard translations and
few
other changes.
THIS spec was generated. If you want other rules, just create another
spec.
besides, last time i asked some POLISH developer to fix
On Sunday 06 January 2008 14:36:20 Tomasz Pala wrote:
And what did you think?
Last time I've reported broken (by someone!) sshd_config YOU told me to
fix it myself.
one difference there is -- fortunes-pl is fun for -pl people only.
--
glen
___
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:36:20PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 14:13:42 +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
you can not generate that spec, because that will discard translations and
few
other changes.
THIS spec was generated. If you want other rules, just create
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:41:16PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I often use a simple script to convert Fedora specs to proper PLD
format (for obvious reasons: most of the Fedora specs make adapter cry
even after 3+ runs and these guys tend to override lots of macros in
each spec file). Had I
2008/1/6, Bartosz Taudul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:41:16PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I often use a simple script to convert Fedora specs to proper PLD
format (for obvious reasons: most of the Fedora specs make adapter cry
even after 3+ runs and these guys tend to
On Sunday 06 January 2008 14:55:07 Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 14:46:27 +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
one difference there is -- fortunes-pl is fun for -pl people only.
So I doesn't make any sense to translate any parts of it.
i did mean by that i couldn't fix package because i
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I mean generators are only useful when they make your work easier. If
it's easier to fix and maintain the result than to fix the generator
then it shouldn't be a real problem.
fortunes-pl.spec generator is really simple. It's just
2008/1/6, Bartosz Taudul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I mean generators are only useful when they make your work easier. If
it's easier to fix and maintain the result than to fix the generator
then it shouldn't be a real problem.
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
2008/1/6, Bartosz Taudul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I mean generators are only useful when they make your work easier. If
it's easier to fix and maintain the result than to fix the generator
then it
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 04:23:55PM +0100, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I mean generators are only useful when they make your work easier. If
it's easier to fix and maintain the result than to fix the generator
then it shouldn't be a
Bartosz Taudul wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 05:06:14PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
fortunes-pl.spec generator is really simple.
And it's broken
It's broken because the spec was fixed, not generator.
if used for something more than pregeneration of initial spec:
The initial generated
Bartosz Taudul wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:05:14PM +0100, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
- uses ISO-8859-2 charset which is deprecated in specs
Convert README to utf-8, add declaration to templates, problem fixed.
READE.en, README.pl, etc. ?
Nah.
- puts incomprehensible
On Saturday 05 January 2008 17:27:39 Bartosz Taudul wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:55:29AM +0100, glen wrote:
-# THIS IS GENERATED FILE. DO NOT EDIT BY HAND.
All your changes will be lost.
i will revert that commit and choke personally who will lose the changes.
wolf
--
glen
13 matches
Mail list logo
