On Wed, 24 May 2006, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> > > - split FHS into FHS and filesystem with R: FHS
> > IMO it's the best solution.
> FHS.spec -> Obsoletes: filesystem ;-)
Well, small history-loop ;)
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl
--
Dnia środa, 24 maja 2006 12:40, Paweł Gołaszewski napisał:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > - split FHS into FHS and filesystem with R: FHS
>
> IMO it's the best solution.
FHS.spec -> Obsoletes: filesystem ;-)
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> - split FHS into FHS and filesystem with R: FHS
IMO it's the best solution.
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from
> > > > %post scripts as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages
> > > > providing .pc files.
> > > Yes, it's a bad dependency, but without it there are problems with
> > > upg
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:29:02PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?= wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 May 2006 11:39, PaweĹ GoĹaszewski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> > > > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from
Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?= wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 May 2006 11:39, PaweĹ GoĹaszewski wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> > > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from
> > > > %post scripts as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 11:39, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from
> > > %post scripts as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing
> > > .pc files.
> >
> > Yes, it's a bad depende
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from
> > %post scripts as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing
> > .pc files.
> Yes, it's a bad dependency, but without it there are problems with
> upgrading rpm on build
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:32:45AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from %post
> > scripts
> >
> > as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files.
It
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:07:51AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > /etc/sysconfig is needed by rpm-base-4.4.6-1.2.i686
> that's something new in rpm?
Yes, it appeared in 4.4.6.
wolf
--
Bartek . - Stare porzekadła, przysłowia są takie dobre, bo zawsze można
Taudul :wybrać to które pas
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 02:41, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:32:45AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from %post
> > scripts
> >
> > as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files.
>
> Yes, it's a
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 02:49, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 May 2006 01:32, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files.
>
> ...and we have an *orphaned* dirs.
> freaky time has ended. abandom all hope, Th will asimilate U.
bring it into FHS
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 01:32, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files.
...and we have an *orphaned* dirs.
freaky time has ended. abandom all hope, Th will asimilate U.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:32:45AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from %post
> scripts
>
> as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files.
Yes, it's a bad dependency, but without it there are problems with
upgrading
that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from %post
scripts
as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files.
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 02:27, you wrote:
> Author: wolf Date: Tue May 23 23:27:12 2006 GMT
> Module: SPECS
15 matches
Mail list logo