Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-24 Thread Paweł Gołaszewski
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Paweł Sikora wrote: > > > - split FHS into FHS and filesystem with R: FHS > > IMO it's the best solution. > FHS.spec -> Obsoletes: filesystem ;-) Well, small history-loop ;) -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl --

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-24 Thread Paweł Sikora
Dnia środa, 24 maja 2006 12:40, Paweł Gołaszewski napisał: > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > - split FHS into FHS and filesystem with R: FHS > > IMO it's the best solution. FHS.spec -> Obsoletes: filesystem ;-) ___ pld-devel-en mailing list

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-24 Thread Paweł Gołaszewski
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > - split FHS into FHS and filesystem with R: FHS IMO it's the best solution. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-24 Thread Paweł Gołaszewski
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from > > > > %post scripts as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages > > > > providing .pc files. > > > Yes, it's a bad dependency, but without it there are problems with > > > upg

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-24 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:29:02PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?= wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 May 2006 11:39, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > > > > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-24 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?= wrote: > On Wednesday 24 May 2006 11:39, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote: > > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > > > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from > > > > %post scripts as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 11:39, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from > > > %post scripts as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing > > > .pc files. > > > > Yes, it's a bad depende

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-24 Thread Paweł Gołaszewski
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from > > %post scripts as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing > > .pc files. > Yes, it's a bad dependency, but without it there are problems with > upgrading rpm on build

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-23 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:32:45AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from %post > > scripts > > > > as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files. It

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-23 Thread Bartosz Taudul
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:07:51AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > /etc/sysconfig is needed by rpm-base-4.4.6-1.2.i686 > that's something new in rpm? Yes, it appeared in 4.4.6. wolf -- Bartek . - Stare porzekadła, przysłowia są takie dobre, bo zawsze można Taudul :wybrać to które pas

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-23 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 02:41, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:32:45AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from %post > > scripts > > > > as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files. > > Yes, it's a

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-23 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 02:49, Paweł Sikora wrote: > On Wednesday 24 May 2006 01:32, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files. > > ...and we have an *orphaned* dirs. > freaky time has ended. abandom all hope, Th will asimilate U. bring it into FHS

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-23 Thread Paweł Sikora
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 01:32, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files. ...and we have an *orphaned* dirs. freaky time has ended. abandom all hope, Th will asimilate U. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-23 Thread Bartosz Taudul
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:32:45AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from %post > scripts > > as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files. Yes, it's a bad dependency, but without it there are problems with upgrading

Re: SPECS: rpm.spec - R: rc-scripts (/etc/sysconfig) - rel 1.4

2006-05-23 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from %post scripts as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files. On Wednesday 24 May 2006 02:27, you wrote: > Author: wolf Date: Tue May 23 23:27:12 2006 GMT > Module: SPECS