On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 06.02.2014 10:36, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Really? You reported seemingly unfixable problem with 3.10 (100% CPU)
without any solution and then switched to THAT kernel?
You are pulling my leg here.
100% cpu problem exists only on one node.
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 05/02/14 19:05, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Hi,
Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I
decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th.
But more important changes
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Hi,
Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I
decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th.
But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are
currently 3 releases behind because of slow
On 05/02/14 19:05, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Hi,
Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I
decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th.
But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are
currently 3
Hi,
Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I
decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th.
But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are
currently 3 releases behind because of slow updates of the Linux-Vserver
patch. So there will be an
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as
2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.
Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days
without problems.
--
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as
2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.
Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days
without problems.
I
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as
2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.
Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Michał Łukaszek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff
as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:07:46 +0100
Lukasz Kies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as
2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default.
Please test
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same
stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff
as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor
Dnia piątek, 19 maja 2006 09:46, Elan Ruusamäe napisał:
you should collect the files after this line:
find '(' -name '*~' -o -name '*.orig' ')' -print0 | xargs -0 -r -l512 rm -f
but imho this rm -f should be moved to %prep instead, after all patches
applied (that's where the backup files came
13 matches
Mail list logo
