Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-20 Thread Artur Wroblewski
2012/4/20 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com: W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 01:03 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org napisał: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote: 2012/4/19 Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org: hi, i would like to move gimp

Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-20 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Artur Wroblewski wrote: hi, i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD. any argument against? Just move 2.6 to GIMP_2_6 branch, keep fractional release on head and yell if someone tries to send it to builders. btw. we have some quite old gimp plugins on

Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-20 Thread Caleb Maclennan
Ac is stable release for which we have appropriate branch and Th is in constant development mode, isn't it? This is one area where PLD's release system is actually pretty wonky. Other than a few emebeded or very static applications, AC is simply too old to use for most stable systems. This puts

Re: packages: authconfig/authconfig.spec - fix python packaging, now things exe...

2012-04-20 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:46:09AM +0200, glen wrote: -%{__rm} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/authconfig-tui.py -ln -s authconfig.py $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/authconfig-tui.py +%py_comp $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} +# libraries, no sources needed +%{__rm} -v

Re: packages: authconfig/authconfig.spec - fix python packaging, now things exe...

2012-04-20 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 20.04.2012 17:40, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:46:09AM +0200, glen wrote: -%{__rm} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/authconfig-tui.py -ln -s authconfig.py $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/authconfig-tui.py +%py_comp $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} +# libraries, no

Re: packages: authconfig/authconfig.spec - fix python packaging, now things exe...

2012-04-20 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:40:53PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: it doesn't behave here so: here it creates .pyc only for imported modules, if invoked via #!/shebang, no .pyc is created for the script itself: [...] In case if %{_bindir} or %{_sbindir} - no script should be named *.py there

th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Artur Wroblewski
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote: Ac is stable release for which we have appropriate branch and Th is in constant development mode, isn't it? This is one area where PLD's release system is actually pretty wonky. Other than a few emebeded or very

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Caleb Maclennan
well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with appropriate branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain that, which I believe is full time job and lack of resources causes the stable branch to freeze. therefore, imho, it is not good idea to

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 20:57 użytkownik Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org napisał: well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with appropriate branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain that, which I believe is full time job and lack of

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
On 20.04.2012 20:57, Caleb Maclennan wrote: well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with appropriate branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain that, which I believe is full time job and lack of resources causes the stable branch to freeze.

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 21:28 użytkownik Andrzej Zawadzki zawa...@gmail.com napisał: On 20.04.2012 20:57, Caleb Maclennan wrote: well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with appropriate branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain that,

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
On 20.04.2012 21:38, Bartosz Świątek wrote: W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 21:28 użytkownik Andrzej Zawadzki zawa...@gmail.com napisał: On 20.04.2012 20:57, Caleb Maclennan wrote: well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with appropriate branch in CVS? of course, the problem

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Artur Wroblewski
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote: well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with appropriate branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain that, which I believe is full time job and lack of resources

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Caleb Maclennan
Caleb, stop trolling*! You're asking very inconvenient questions :) Wink wink. I'm not actually trying to troll or be inconvenient. I'm also not interested in pointing fingers. I am a system administrator having a hard time keeping up with all the broken systems. I think a contributing factor

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 22:26 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org napisał: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote: well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with appropriate branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Caleb Maclennan
2012/4/20 Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org: it is very simple. th-stable, ac-stable or whatever... provide meaningful, self documenting names to things. Hey guys, how does this compute? My version control experience is mostly subversion with a bit of git lately. CVS is still black magic