[Th] Re: upgrade failed OK: espeak.spec

2007-05-20 Thread Tomasz Wittner 
On Sun 20. of May 2007, 12:31, PLD th-ppc builder wrote:
 espeak.spec (HEAD): OK
[...]
 error: Failed dependencies:
   /usr/lib/libespeak.so.1 is needed by espeak-devel-1.25-1.ppc
 package upgrade failed
This error occurs only on Th. Of curse, /usr/lib/libespeak.so.1 is not 
packaged but only created in %post by ldconfig. Does anyone know, how to fix 
this?
[...]
-- 
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: [Th] Re: upgrade failed OK: espeak.spec

2007-05-20 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz 
Tomasz Wittner wrote:
 
 On Sun 20. of May 2007, 12:31, PLD th-ppc builder wrote:
  espeak.spec (HEAD): OK
 [...]
  error: Failed dependencies:
  /usr/lib/libespeak.so.1 is needed by espeak-devel-1.25-1.ppc
  package upgrade failed
 This error occurs only on Th. Of curse, /usr/lib/libespeak.so.1 is not 
 packaged but only created in %post by ldconfig. Does anyone know, how to fix 
 this?
 [...]

Package the file /usr/lib/libespeak.so.1 as %ghost ?

-- 
===
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  phone (48)(58) 347 19 36
Faculty of Applied Phys.  Math.,   Gdansk University of Technology
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: official rpm replacements for our SourceX-md5

2007-05-20 Thread Jeff Johnson 

On May 20, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:

 On 5/19/07, Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Here's the proof-of-concept announcement, feel free to break ;-)

  https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/rpm-devel/2007-May/
 002701.html

 Adding non-rpmio external transport, multiple digest algorithms, and
 refactoring the
 goop out of *.spec (by appending info to spec file from external  
 YAML/
 XML)
 are all planned soonishly.

 Any chances for a shorthand macro that expands to said constructs?


What part of
 BuildRequires: digest(%{SOURCE0}) =  
4ee21e9dcc9b5b6012c23038734e1632
can be hidden in a shorthand macro?

Getting digests out of spec files into a different, automagically  
generated, location that is appended
to a spec file when building is likely a better approach than macros.  
Manually typing digests is annoying.

73 de Jeff
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en