Re: rescuecd.spec - problems with sending build request
On Saturday 29 March 2008 17:52, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: If you want to fix anything, I'd suggest fixing the spec by using an unambiguous URI. Its not unambiguous, its correct. If I write at the beginning http then its obvious that this is a http:// URI. If I will write ftp:// then its obvious that this will be a ftp URI. Builder also has this information and could even decide what to do when getting files from distfiles. The URI is correct but wget's behavior is non-standard. It should not include the question mark and the params in the file name and distfiles/builder should not depend on it. we could enforce -O outfile to wget, and i think we should. not sure how it would be included on ~/.builderrc due different downloaders [0]. and of course different df download schema is already supported [1]. $ cat ~/.builderrc PROTOCOL=http # [1] USE_AXEL=yes # [0] AXEL_OPTS=-n 6 $ -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: DISTFILES: roundcubemail-0.1-r1223-20080330.tar.gz
On Sunday 30 March 2008 15:05:28 you wrote: Files fetched: 0 ALREADY GOT: no-url://roundcubemail-0.1-r1223-20080330.tar.gz 0006edead2286908d8145b1be181f110 roundcubemail-0.1-r1223-20080330.tar.gz nice checksum :) -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Package with make-request.sh?
Added, thanks. -- Regards, Kamil Dziedzic signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: rescuecd.spec - problems with sending build request
Elan Ruusamäe wrote: and always possible to upload file with custom name to distfiles and use nourl sources in such cases. How? For example I need this for make-request.spec. But this is still ugly workaround. -- Regards, Kamil Dziedzic signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: rescuecd.spec - problems with sending build request
Dnia sobota 29 marzec 2008, Patryk Zawadzki napisał: Do we need this? Where and for what? For using distfiles. But where is a problem? Please be more verbose. Why it will fail if we will use my method? Some example. See above. wget is not the only downloader on the planet. Ok I understand this, but right now on builders it is used. I understand also that wget's method to get files is bad but right now we are using it. So I want simply fix/workaround this method so this will start work right now. Ok eot from me. I only want to say that builder script doesn't work well right now and this is highly uncomfortable to use workarounds for Sources which uses some special characters. This is really ugly;) -- Regards, Kamil Dziedzic signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: rescuecd.spec - problems with sending build request
Kamil Dziedzic wrote: Elan Ruusam=C3=A4e wrote: and always possible to upload file with custom name to distfiles and use nourl sources in such cases. How? For example I need this for make-request.spec. Manually using dropin test.spec ? -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 19 36 Faculty of Applied Phys. Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
