Re: $HOME of system users like nobody or stats
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:00:00PM +0100, Pawe? Zuzelski wrote: > mount.davfs (provided by davfs2 package) does not allow > non-root user to mount filesystem into another users home > directory. Problem is that home directory of nobody and stats > users (both provided by setup package) is "/". > > I would like to change home directory of these users to > "/usr/share/empty". Will it break something? $ egrep '^(nobody|sshd):' /etc/passwd nobody:x:99:99:Nobody:/var/nobody:/dev/null sshd:x:109:117::/var/empty:/dev/null (it's ALT Linux, Owl GNU/*/Linux does probably the same) -- WBR, Michael Shigorin -- Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: new spec (lyricue)
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > Thanks for the links to relevant current developer documentation. I'll > keep an eye on those guidelines. > > I have to say that even having been an avid PLD user for 10+ years the > lack of clear easy to find documentation (and the amount of outdated, > irrelevant and contradictory documentation floating around in dozens > of locations) is making me dizzy. > > I have subscribed to the cvs commit list and will try to keep up with > what's current that way. Just don't be afraid to commit - there will be always someone, who will correct you - nothing wrong with that (just ignore rudeness, which may happen when someone has bad day ;). You may ask on the list or irc if not sure about some stuff. Best regards, w ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: new spec (lyricue)
Thanks for the links to relevant current developer documentation. I'll keep an eye on those guidelines. I have to say that even having been an avid PLD user for 10+ years the lack of clear easy to find documentation (and the amount of outdated, irrelevant and contradictory documentation floating around in dozens of locations) is making me dizzy. I have subscribed to the cvs commit list and will try to keep up with what's current that way. Caleb 2010/3/29 Elan Ruusamäe : > On Monday 29 March 2010 14:48:05 Caleb Maclennan wrote: >> Question about log messages. I noticed after I committed a bump to the >> version of hugin last night that most log messages for spec file >> commits start with a leading dash. Does this have a special meaning or >> is it just convention that I should follow or did I fail in some other >> way? > > it is explained in here: > http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/PLD-doc/HACKING > > also you mind find this useful: > http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/PLD-doc/BuildRequires.txt > > and these two (depending on your language preference) > http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/PLD-doc/devel-hints-en.txt > http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/PLD-doc/devel-hints-pl.txt > > however, these may not be exactly up to date, most of the knowledge comes imho > via monitoring of spec commits. > > and when creating new .specs, there are somewhat useful templates: > http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/template-specs/ > > -- > glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: new spec (lyricue)
On Monday 29 March 2010 14:48:05 Caleb Maclennan wrote: > Question about log messages. I noticed after I committed a bump to the > version of hugin last night that most log messages for spec file > commits start with a leading dash. Does this have a special meaning or > is it just convention that I should follow or did I fail in some other > way? it is explained in here: http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/PLD-doc/HACKING also you mind find this useful: http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/PLD-doc/BuildRequires.txt and these two (depending on your language preference) http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/PLD-doc/devel-hints-en.txt http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/PLD-doc/devel-hints-pl.txt however, these may not be exactly up to date, most of the knowledge comes imho via monitoring of spec commits. and when creating new .specs, there are somewhat useful templates: http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/template-specs/ -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: new spec (lyricue)
Should I give a holler here or directly to somebody when I have a commit or will things been seen and reviewed? Question about log messages. I noticed after I committed a bump to the version of hugin last night that most log messages for spec file commits start with a leading dash. Does this have a special meaning or is it just convention that I should follow or did I fail in some other way? I'm working on that lyricue spec i started with three years ago, but it needs some upgrading now seeing that it's a few versions old! Caleb 2010/3/29 Elan Ruusamäe : > are you all aware who gave +1, that you should be mentoring his commits? :) > > On Saturday 10 November 2007 01:53:33 Aria Stewart wrote: >> +1 for me for commit access. > > On Saturday 10 November 2007 02:06:07 Krystian Tomczyk wrote: >> +1 > > On Tuesday 13 November 2007 01:56:42 Arkadiusz Patyk wrote: >> +1 ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: new spec (lyricue)
are you all aware who gave +1, that you should be mentoring his commits? :) On Saturday 10 November 2007 01:53:33 Aria Stewart wrote: > +1 for me for commit access. On Saturday 10 November 2007 02:06:07 Krystian Tomczyk wrote: > +1 On Tuesday 13 November 2007 01:56:42 Arkadiusz Patyk wrote: > +1 -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
