On 21.04.2011 11:24, Michal Lisowski wrote:
W dniu 21.04.2011 10:00, Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
On 20.04.2011 16:51, Michał Lisowski wrote:
These two packages are now merged and will be released as
ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-version format.
Please cp ntfs-3g to ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs then.
perhaps too rushy? w
On 21.04.2011 12:22, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
Yes, the Provides and Obsoletes will take care of being able to
upgrade and replace the previous package names. The problem is that
there is no notification feature for the OLD packages, they jus
> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/packages/obsoleted/obsoleted.spec?rev=HEAD
>
> It works by building an empty package that marks the upgrade target
> and immediately gets obsoleted by said target. There is nothing to
> clean up then.
Where have you been all my life?
__
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> Maybe we should provide empty rpms for the obsoleted packages with the
> appropriate R: and some special name in release field? For example:
> ntfs-3g-1.2.3-69.packageexpired, R: ntfs3g-newshit
>
> Then we may have a simple cron job that wo
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> Yes, the Provides and Obsoletes will take care of being able to
> upgrade and replace the previous package names. The problem is that
> there is no notification feature for the OLD packages, they just get
> stuck at an old version and even
>> or how do you foresee the upgrade path in pld if both package names just
>> dissapear?
>
> Some Provides and Obsoletes should be sufficient. Correct meif i'm wrong.
Yes, the Provides and Obsoletes will take care of being able to
upgrade and replace the previous package names. The problem is tha
W dniu 21.04.2011 10:00, Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
On 20.04.2011 16:51, Michał Lisowski wrote:
These two packages are now merged and will be released as
ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-version format.
Please cp ntfs-3g to ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs then.
perhaps too rushy? wait what official upstream decides [1]?
just
On 20.04.2011 16:51, Michał Lisowski wrote:
These two packages are now merged and will be released as
ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-version format.
Please cp ntfs-3g to ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs then.
perhaps too rushy? wait what official upstream decides [1]?
just build -n ntfsprogs package from current ntfs-3g
