Re: packages: areca-cli/areca-cli.spec (NEW) - new; seems redistributable

2012-07-04 Thread Elan Ruusamäe

On 07/03/2012 11:16 PM, glen wrote:

Author: glen Date: Tue Jul  3 20:16:47 2012 GMT
Module: packages  Tag: HEAD
 Log message:
- new; seems redistributable

 Files affected:
packages/areca-cli:
areca-cli.spec (NONE -  1.1)  (NEW)

 Diffs:


Index: packages/areca-cli/areca-cli.spec
diff -u /dev/null packages/areca-cli/areca-cli.spec:1.1
--- /dev/null   Tue Jul  3 22:16:47 2012
+++ packages/areca-cli/areca-cli.spec   Tue Jul  3 22:16:42 2012
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# $Revision$, $Date$
+Summary:   Utility to control Areca SATA RAID controllers
+Name:  areca-cli
+Version:   1.86
+Release:   1
+# 
http://www.areca.us/support/download/RaidCards/Documents/Manual_Spec/Downloadable_Software_Licenses.zip
+# Linux Exception: redistributable if not modified
+License:   License for Customer Use of Areca Software


can somebody read the license and check whether we can repackage and 
distribute it?


--
glen

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Git migration: beta version

2012-07-04 Thread Kacper Kornet
I'm sorry but this time only English version.


The beta version of git setup is in place. Basic informations:

1. Access: git://git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG
  ssh://g...@git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG

You can try to fetch packages and upload your changes. Don't be afraid
to break something. Anny changes you will make will be overwritten
during the final migration.

3. Web interface:

http://git.pld-linux.org/

Displaying the list of all packages can be a little slow. So probably
you want to use http://git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG


2. Mailing list with commit notifications: t...@lists.pld.linux.org

Right now two types of notifications are sent to the list:

a. commits relating to single branch are grouped into one email
b. every commit go to a single email.

For example:
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/52.html

and 

http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/53.html
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/54.html

We need to decide which version is preferred.


3. ciabot - switched off for now


4. Updated builder.sh script: git://github.com/draenog/rpm-build-tools


5. Updated version of tool to fetch changed repositories more
efficiently: git-core-slug-0.12-1. Please read man slug.py


6. Documentation:
http://www.pld-linux.org/dokuwiki/howto-git
http://www.pld-linux.org/dokuwiki/cvs2git


Any bug reports, comments etc. more then welcome.

-- 
  Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: Git migration: beta version

2012-07-04 Thread Paweł Sikora
On Wednesday 04 of July 2012 18:39:56 Kacper Kornet wrote:
 I'm sorry but this time only English version.
 
 
 The beta version of git setup is in place. Basic informations:
 
 1. Access: git://git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG
   ssh://g...@git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG
 
 You can try to fetch packages and upload your changes.

ssh access doesn't work on port 22.
on port 24 it works only for user git.
what about access via custom ssh-keys?

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: Git migration: beta version

2012-07-04 Thread Kacper Kornet
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:27:53PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
 On Wednesday 04 of July 2012 18:39:56 Kacper Kornet wrote:
  I'm sorry but this time only English version.


  The beta version of git setup is in place. Basic informations:

  1. Access: git://git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG
ssh://g...@git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG

  You can try to fetch packages and upload your changes.

 ssh access doesn't work on port 22.

fixed

 on port 24 it works only for user git.

Everybodu shoud use user git.

 what about access via custom ssh-keys?

Your key should work for user git.

-- 
  Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: Git migration: beta version

2012-07-04 Thread Paweł Sikora
On Wednesday 04 of July 2012 18:39:56 Kacper Kornet wrote:

 Any bug reports, comments etc. more then welcome.

1). do we really need two notifications for single event?

http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/62.html
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/63.html

2). [x/n] naming

for consistency, the short merge description 
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/66.html
should be called a [0/n] merge foo branch and following [{1..n}/n] patches 
should
be sent as a reply to the 0/n (for easier emails threading).

or... the [x/n] marking should be dropped at all.

moreover, these notifications duplicate information from 'branch master 
updated' emails.

imho, too much redundant notifications around the merge event.

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: Git migration: beta version

2012-07-04 Thread Kacper Kornet
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 08:28:07PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
 On Wednesday 04 of July 2012 18:39:56 Kacper Kornet wrote:

  Any bug reports, comments etc. more then welcome.

 1). do we really need two notifications for single event?

 http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/62.html
 http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/63.html

We have to choose one of them. All commits per branch per push in one
mail (emails without [] brackets in subject), or one commit per email
(emails with [] brackets in subjects). Right now there are two to show
possible options.

 2). [x/n] naming

 for consistency, the short merge description 
 http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/66.html
 should be called a [0/n] merge foo branch and following [{1..n}/n] 
 patches should
 be sent as a reply to the 0/n (for easier emails threading).

The first mail (without numbers) is a sort of description. It never
contains a diff so it has no number. It shows which numbers in sequence
(1..n)/n will be missing. I will check what can be done about threading.

 or... the [x/n] marking should be dropped at all.

 moreover, these notifications duplicate information from 'branch master 
 updated' emails.

 imho, too much redundant notifications around the merge event.

As I have written above. Right now there is some redundancy to show
possible options. Depending on the choice we will make you can ignore
emails with or without [] brackets in subjects.

-- 
  Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en