Dnia Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:56:25PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:39:39PM +0100, witekfl wrote:
> > commit 3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486
> > Author: Witold Filipczyk
> > Date: Sat Feb 3 20:24:04 2024 +0100
> >
> >
Dnia Tue, May 17, 2022 at 03:10:44PM +0200, Peri Noid napisał(a):
> Dnia wtorek, 17 maja 2022 10:47:35 CEST Andrzej Zawadzki pisze:
> >Hi,
> >
> >after upgrade.
> >
> >Do we need rebuild with newer libraries?
> >
> >Application: Powiadomienia Odkrywcy (DiscoverNotifier), signal:
is is strange that it needs binary at build
>time.
Try release 1.1, but to really check you must uninstall/rename freerdp binary
at build time.
>
>--
>
>Andrzej Zawadzki
>
>On 09.07.2021 20:15, witekfl wrote:
>
> commit 7632d3b22df6b289ba3bc5285530bf7cda3
Hi,
kernel-5.13.0-1 is with debug, a bit big.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:56:47PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:56:17PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
this must be reverted:
$ rpm -qf /lib64
FHS-2.3-37.i686
Uh, %with macro misuse. Fixed.
The same issue is in the filesysytem.spec
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
Kernel build for non-PAE i686 is what I want.
Will be there today on i686, but only for head, so no vserver.
Thanks.
___
pld-devel-en
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:01:58PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for removal.
Proposal: remove i486 from Th.
Rationale:
It's increasingly more problematic to get everything built on i486, some
packages explicitly say no to this arch,
Jakub Bogusz qboosh at pld-linux.org writes:
How to split it?
One big package is too big e.g. for non-GUI apps.
RH/Fedora uses base and -gui.
Rosa (Mandriva?) uses libqt5core etc.
In qt4 we used QtModule convention - should we follow it, using Qt5Module
packages?
Alternatives are:
