Re: [packages/openssl102: 432/432] - cloned from openssl branch v1.0.2 as openssl102 to make it parallel-installable with current 1.1.1
On 01/10/2018 22.17, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 29/09/2018 02:37, adwol wrote: > altho i prefer just to keep same package multiple versions installed: > > > # rpm -q openssl > openssl-1.0.2o-1.x86_64 > openssl-1.1.1-1.x86_64 This does not work well with upgrades (e.g. „upgrade *” in poldek gives „multiple versions installed”). IMHO separate package with own name is much cleaner. For me it does not matter much if it is build from a different branch of the same spec or from a separate repo, but as branches is how we do it with kernel or php, then I guess it is the way to go. Jacek ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/openssl102: 432/432] - cloned from openssl branch v1.0.2 as openssl102 to make it parallel-installable with current 1.1.1
On 29/09/2018 02:37, adwol wrote: commit 9fc1b1b87b259e8a327c99835865e91a391efc9e Author: Adam Osuchowski Date: Sat Sep 29 00:55:56 2018 +0200 - cloned from openssl branch v1.0.2 as openssl102 to make it parallel-installable with current 1.1.1 and newer openssl-man-namespace.patch | 6 +- openssl.spec => openssl102.spec | 158 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/openssl.spec b/openssl102.spec why not just update Name on openssl package branch? altho i prefer just to keep same package multiple versions installed: # rpm -q openssl openssl-1.0.2o-1.x86_64 openssl-1.1.1-1.x86_64 ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
