Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, Speaking of rpm features: ~: kadu [from Ac] kadu: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.0.9.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ~: host [from Th] host: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.0.9.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ~: rpm -V kadu bind-utils ~: rpm -qa openssl\* openssl-tools-0.9.7i-2 openssl-devel-0.9.7i-2 openssl-0.9.7i-2 -- Tom Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/ http://tccs.sourceforge.net/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:05:22PM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, Speaking of rpm features: ~: kadu [from Ac] kadu: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.0.9.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ~: host [from Th] host: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.0.9.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ~: rpm -V kadu bind-utils ~: rpm -qa openssl\* openssl-tools-0.9.7i-2 openssl-devel-0.9.7i-2 openssl-0.9.7i-2 In case of host: rpm -V bind-libs And similarly for some libraries which kadu is linked to. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:24:13PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: In case of host: rpm -V bind-libs And similarly for some libraries which kadu is linked to. ~: rpm -Va --nofiles Unsatisfied dependencies for X11-Xnest-6.9.0-2.athlon: X11-common = 1:6.9.0-2, X11-modules = 1:6.9.0-2 Unsatisfied dependencies for X11-OpenGL-libs-6.9.0-1.athlon: X11-libs = 1:6.9.0-1 Unsatisfied dependencies for rpm-4.4.2-36.athlon: rpm-base = 4.4.2-36 Unsatisfied dependencies for X11-tools-6.9.0-1.athlon: X11 = 1:6.9.0-1, X11-libs = 1:6.9.0-1, libdps.so.1, man-config Unsatisfied dependencies for gnome-vfs2-2.14.2-1.athlon: gnome-vfs2-libs = 2.14.2-1 Unsatisfied dependencies for qtconfig-3.3.6-2.athlon: qt = 6:3.3.6-2 Unsatisfied dependencies for xorg-xserver-xgl-0.0.20060426-1.athlon: xorg-font-font-alias, xorg-font-font-cursor-misc, xorg-font-font-misc-misc-base Unsatisfied dependencies for qt-designer-libs-3.3.6-2.athlon: qt = 6:3.3.6-2 Unsatisfied dependencies for XFree86-4.4.0-10.athlon: XFree86-libs = 1:4.4.0-10, libXfontcache.so.1 Unsatisfied dependencies for rpm-perlprov-4.4.6-1.6.athlon: rpm = 4.4.6-1.6 Unsatisfied dependencies for kpathsea-2.0.2-7.athlon: tetex = 1:2.0.2-7 Unsatisfied dependencies for rpm-pythonprov-4.4.6-1.6.athlon: rpm = 4.4.6-1.6 Unsatisfied dependencies for X11-libs-6.9.0-9.athlon: X11-common = 1:6.9.0-9 -- Tom Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/ http://tccs.sourceforge.net/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
[th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, of course. -- Radosław Zieliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpdeldtRyX3W.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:51, havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, of course. Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of application specific directories in filesystem.spec. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not
everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide
configs for it)
Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of
application specific directories in filesystem.spec.
I'd prefer more or less generic dirs in one package then _tons_ of
single one dir packages.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of application specific directories in filesystem.spec. I'd prefer more or less generic dirs in one package then _tons_ of single one dir packages. The dir should still belong to monit. The apache files that are located in this dir should go to a subpackage. -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:24, havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of application specific directories in filesystem.spec. I'd prefer more or less generic dirs in one package then _tons_ of single one dir packages. ? The *dir* should be only in monit.spec package while apache config file for monit in monit-apache subpackage. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:51, havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, of course. Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) but mostly they already require logrotate (i'm speaking of packages providing logrotate config). not that i always want logrotate (f.e inside vserver). otherwise on my average system i have installed: # rpm -qf /etc/monit/* apache1-1.3.37-1 apache-base-2.2.3-1 mysql-5.0.24-2 -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:31:57PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
The *dir* should be only in monit.spec package while apache config file for
monit in monit-apache subpackage.
True, sorry for misunderstanding.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [23-08-2006 20:28]: havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of application specific directories in filesystem.spec. I'd prefer more or less generic dirs in one package then _tons_ of single one dir packages. The dir should still belong to monit. The apache files that are located in this dir should go to a subpackage. Or maybe put the file in monit as well? It's monit configuration after all. -- Radosław Zieliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpyoBJL4pS3C.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
