Re: [th] rpm.spec - packaging problem

2007/11/9, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The default (rpm/lib/rpmds.c ~ 1546) is: > #define _ETC_RPM_SYSINFOSYSCONFIGDIR "/sysinfo" Upon further investigation, this is used as a callback when the macro below returns nothing, so the answer is clear: > We can patch either that line

Re: [th] rpm.spec - packaging problem

2007/11/9, Jakub Bogusz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:06:23PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > > Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects > > /etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside: > > > > "Providename", > > "Requirename"

Re: [th] rpm.spec - packaging problem

On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:06:23PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects > /etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside: > > "Providename", > "Requirename", > "Conflictname", > "Obsoletename", > "Dir

Re: [th] rpm.spec - packaging problem

2007/11/9, Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Nov 9, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Friday 09 of November 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > >> Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects > >> /etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files insid

Re: [th] rpm.spec - packaging problem

2007/11/9, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Friday 09 of November 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > > Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects > > /etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside: > > Not "expects". It simply supports both schemas.

Re: [th] rpm.spec - packaging problem

On Nov 9, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Friday 09 of November 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: >> Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects >> /etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside: > > Not "expects". It simply supports both schem

Re: [th] rpm.spec - packaging problem

On Friday 09 of November 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects > /etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside: Not "expects". It simply supports both schemas. > Therefore I propose fixing the packaging to adapt the new

[th] rpm.spec - packaging problem

Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects /etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside: "Providename", "Requirename", "Conflictname", "Obsoletename", "Dirnames", "Filelinktos" (Taken from rpm/lib/rpmds.c) In PLD we still provide