Dnia 2012-07-01, nie o godzinie 22:13 +0200, Jacek Konieczny pisze:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Tomasz Rutkowski wrote:
cluster.spec was my work of 3rd generation of redhat cluster suite
(dlm+cman+gfs2+rgmanager), there is bcond in lvm2 to complete stack, but
it's already
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:15:18AM +0200, Tomasz Rutkowski wrote:
What do you mean by '3.1 won't build with pacemaker'? There was no
pacemaker dependency in cluster.spec
well, if You would like to control dlm space from within pacemaker You
need daemon dlm_controld.pcmk - this one
2012/7/1 Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:47:19PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 07/01/2012 11:51 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Do we need clvmd in the main lvm2 package? It pulls some dependencies
irrelevant for non-clustered setups.
i'm in for moving clustered
On 02.07.2012 14:41, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
Has the possibility of manually adding some sort of warning flag
between certain upgrades been considered?
there is warning message that is displayed AFTER upgrade (via
%triggerpostun or just %post) :)
and if the upgrade breakage is really serious
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:01:05PM +0300, Elan Ruusam??e wrote:
and if the upgrade breakage is really serious and detectable,
package could abort upgrade with exit in %prein scriptlet.
rarely used, afaik i saw it somewhere
e.g. glibc-preinstall in ALT Linux :)
--
WBR, Michael Shigorin
Hello,
At work we use clusters. Currently based on Heartbeat/PaceMaker/DRBD,
but I am trying to introduce Corosync and clustered LVM. All based on
PLD packages… and I have found a bit of mess in our packages.
We have both corosync and openais, but our openais is 0.80, not 1.x
which uses corosync
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Hello,
At work we use clusters. Currently based on Heartbeat/PaceMaker/DRBD,
but I am trying to introduce Corosync and clustered LVM. All based on
PLD packages??? and I have found a bit of mess in our packages.
We have both
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Does anybody still needs openais 0.80?
Updated question: does anybody still need openais at all? It seems not
maintained any more and won't build with corosync 2.0… and other stuff
seem to expect corosync 2 now…
I guess openais
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:36:57PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Does anybody still needs openais 0.80?
Updated question: does anybody still need openais at all? It seems not
maintained any more and won't build with corosync
Dnia 2012-07-01, nie o godzinie 15:41 +0200, Jacek Konieczny pisze:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:36:57PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Does anybody still needs openais 0.80?
Updated question: does anybody still need openais
On 07/01/2012 11:51 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Do we need clvmd in the main lvm2 package? It pulls some dependencies
irrelevant for non-clustered setups.
i'm in for moving clustered deps to subpackages. if it's doable.
personally not using any clustering setups
--
glen
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Tomasz Rutkowski wrote:
cluster.spec was my work of 3rd generation of redhat cluster suite
(dlm+cman+gfs2+rgmanager), there is bcond in lvm2 to complete stack, but
it's already outdated (needs polishing :))
I have replaced this bcond with something
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:47:19PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 07/01/2012 11:51 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Do we need clvmd in the main lvm2 package? It pulls some dependencies
irrelevant for non-clustered setups.
i'm in for moving clustered deps to subpackages. if it's doable.
Already
13 matches
Mail list logo
