Re: RFC: shell completions policy change?
On 14.07.2022 16:38, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> As more and more packages are getting bash/zsh completions, separate
> completions packages are becoming useless (harder to find, even not
> suggested).
>
> My proposal:
> 1) add %{bash_compdir}, %{zsh_compdir} and maybe %{fish_compdir} (and upper
> level) dirs to filesystem package and package bash/zsh[/fish] completion
> files just with commands (existing bash-/zsh-[/fish-] packages to be merged
> and
> obsoleted). [preferred]
> Fortunately completion files don't have shebangs, which would generate
> bash/zsh dependencies.
Never had an issue with finding completions but I'm all for less
subpackages so +1.
> 2) at least add Suggests for completions packages in packages with
> commands to complete
>
>
> --
> Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
> ___
> pld-devel-en mailing list
> pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: RFC: shell completions policy change?
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> As more and more packages are getting bash/zsh completions, separate
> completions packages are becoming useless (harder to find, even not
> suggested).
>
> My proposal:
> 1) add %{bash_compdir}, %{zsh_compdir} and maybe %{fish_compdir} (and upper
> level) dirs to filesystem package and package bash/zsh[/fish] completion
> files just with commands (existing bash-/zsh-[/fish-] packages to be merged
> and
> obsoleted). [preferred]
> Fortunately completion files don't have shebangs, which would generate
> bash/zsh dependencies.
+1
Yes, it's a pain to find those subpackages.
--
Jan Rękorajski| PLD/Linux
SysAdm | bagginspld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: RFC: shell completions policy change?
On 14.07.2022 16:38, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
As more and more packages are getting bash/zsh completions, separate
completions packages are becoming useless (harder to find, even not suggested).
My proposal:
1) add %{bash_compdir}, %{zsh_compdir} and maybe %{fish_compdir} (and upper
level) dirs to filesystem package and package bash/zsh[/fish] completion
files just with commands (existing bash-/zsh-[/fish-] packages to be merged and
obsoleted). [preferred]
Fortunately completion files don't have shebangs, which would generate
bash/zsh dependencies.
+1
2) at least add Suggests for completions packages in packages with
commands to complete
-1
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
RFC: shell completions policy change?
As more and more packages are getting bash/zsh completions, separate
completions packages are becoming useless (harder to find, even not suggested).
My proposal:
1) add %{bash_compdir}, %{zsh_compdir} and maybe %{fish_compdir} (and upper
level) dirs to filesystem package and package bash/zsh[/fish] completion
files just with commands (existing bash-/zsh-[/fish-] packages to be merged and
obsoleted). [preferred]
Fortunately completion files don't have shebangs, which would generate
bash/zsh dependencies.
2) at least add Suggests for completions packages in packages with
commands to complete
--
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
