Re: gcc-dirs - how it is supposed to work?

2017-01-02 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Monday 02 of January 2017, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 02.01.2017 12:12, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > "gcc for multilib on x86_64 needs gcc x32 installed. That requires > > gcc-dirs from both architectures" > > > > so I want to install gcc x

Re: gcc-dirs - how it is supposed to work?

2017-01-02 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 02.01.2017 12:12, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: "gcc for multilib on x86_64 needs gcc x32 installed. That requires gcc-dirs from both architectures" so I want to install gcc x86_64 and gcc x32 on the same machine. but aren't there multilib packages (ix86 and x32) built from gcc-x86

Re: gcc-dirs - how it is supposed to work?

2017-01-02 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
then with big picture > given can suggest actually something. See first mail "gcc for multilib on x86_64 needs gcc x32 installed. That requires gcc-dirs from both architectures" so I want to install gcc x86_64 and gcc x32 on the same machine. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz,

Re: gcc-dirs - how it is supposed to work?

2017-01-02 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 02.01.2017 10:46, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: Maybe creating single noarch package with all directories for all our architectures would be a better solution? what are you doing anyway? describe the usecase then with big picture given can suggest actually something. -- glen

Re: gcc-dirs - how it is supposed to work?

2017-01-02 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Monday 02 of January 2017, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 01 of January 2017, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > On 01.01.2017 22:36, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > > poldek:/all-avail> just-install --test gcc-dirs-1.0-6.x32 > > > gcc-dirs-1.0-6.x32: eq

Re: gcc-dirs - how it is supposed to work?

2017-01-01 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Sunday 01 of January 2017, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 01.01.2017 22:36, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > poldek:/all-avail> just-install --test gcc-dirs-1.0-6.x32 > > gcc-dirs-1.0-6.x32: equal version installed, skipped > > Nothing to do > > poldek -i should work

Re: gcc-dirs - how it is supposed to work?

2017-01-01 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 01.01.2017 22:36, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: poldek:/all-avail> just-install --test gcc-dirs-1.0-6.x32 gcc-dirs-1.0-6.x32: equal version installed, skipped Nothing to do poldek -i should work i.e afaik: just-install and poldek -i behave differently -- g

gcc-dirs - how it is supposed to work?

2017-01-01 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
gcc for multilib on x86_64 needs gcc x32 installed. That requires gcc-dirs from both architectures but: [root@carme-pld ~]# rpm -q gcc-dirs gcc-dirs-1.0-6.x86_64 [root@carme-pld ~]# poldek -n th -n th-i686 -n th-x32 Loading [pndir]th-arch... Loading [pndir]th-noarch... Loading [pndir]th-i686

Re: gcc-dirs

2012-07-18 Thread Paweł Sikora
On Friday 06 of July 2012 17:03:27 Elan Ruusamäe wrote: /usr/lib64/gcc probably it could be moved into filesystem.spec like others dirs. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org

gcc-dirs

2012-07-06 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/gcc/ gcc-dirs-1.0-5.x86_64 gcc-4.7.1-4.x86_64 what should be here? i understand the gcc-dirs was added for crossfoo-gcc packages? seems the change itself which added dir to gcc package is old as first gcc4 in HEAD: http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/cvs