Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects
/etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside:
Providename,
Requirename,
Conflictname,
Obsoletename,
Dirnames,
Filelinktos
(Taken from rpm/lib/rpmds.c)
In PLD we still provide it as a
On Friday 09 of November 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects
/etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside:
Not expects. It simply supports both schemas.
Therefore I propose fixing the packaging to adapt the new
2007/11/9, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 09 of November 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects
/etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside:
Not expects. It simply supports both schemas.
2007/11/9, Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 9, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Friday 09 of November 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects
/etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside:
Not
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:06:23PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects
/etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside:
Providename,
Requirename,
Conflictname,
Obsoletename,
Dirnames,
2007/11/9, Jakub Bogusz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:06:23PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Last year rpm switched the /etc/rpm/sysinfo syntax. Now it expects
/etc/rpm/sysinfo to be a directory with following files inside:
Providename,
Requirename,
2007/11/9, Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The default (rpm/lib/rpmds.c ~ 1546) is:
#define _ETC_RPM_SYSINFOSYSCONFIGDIR /sysinfo
Upon further investigation, this is used as a callback when the macro
below returns nothing, so the answer is clear:
We can patch either that line or
On Nov 9, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
Up until now my contributions have been made by proxy through
aredridel, but I have been lurking here on the devel list for some
time and decided there was no reason I couldn't offer to be
involved more directly. I am experienced as a
Dnia 09-11-2007, Pt o godzinie 16:53 -0700, Aria Stewart pisze:
On Nov 9, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
Up until now my contributions have been made by proxy through
aredridel, but I have been lurking here on the devel list for some
time and decided there was no reason I
Caleb Maclennan wrote:
Hello all,
Hi Caleb,
Just few hot comments on your spec:
BuildRoot:%{tmpdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(id -u -n)
Patch0: %{name}-makefile.patch
Patch1: %{name}-desktop.patch
We try to keep the BuildRoot entry as the last in this
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
Caleb Maclennan wrote:
Hello all,
Hi Caleb,
Just few hot comments on your spec:
BuildRoot: %{tmpdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(id -u -n)
Patch0: %{name}-makefile.patch
Patch1: %{name}-desktop.patch
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 06:11:19PM -0700, Aria Stewart wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
We try to keep the BuildRoot entry as the last in this section.
Patch# just
after Sources.
Indeed. The ./adapter script in the SPECS repo does a lot of this.
The
Thanks for the pointers Andrzej. I am attaching an updated
spec file with your changes.
Caleb
# $Revision:$, $Date:$
Summary:The GNU Lyric Display System
Name: lyricue
Version:1.9.6
Release:0.6
License:GPL
Group: X11/Applications/Graphics
URL:
On Saturday 10 November 2007 03:21:36 Caleb Maclennan wrote:
Thanks for the pointers Andrzej. I am attaching an updated
spec file with your changes.
Caleb
%dir %{_docdir}/lyricue
%doc %{_docdir}/lyricue/*
first dir should be also %doc
but rather using rpmbuildroot paths use relative %doc
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 04:16:36AM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
but rather using rpmbuildroot paths use relative %doc from builddir, then
documents get compressed too:
%doc docs/*
Ok, this didn't quite make sense to me but I think I figured out
what you were after. See if this fits the bill.
15 matches
Mail list logo