Re: Firefox

On 16.10.2005 17:52, Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Could you do the same with the --enable-optimization line removed? I think this might be the problem and having this removes is still better than using Mozilla-provided binary packages (and they happen to have this option removed when

Re: Firefox

I played with mozilla-firefox.spec today and managed to get more or less working firefox. I disabled freetype2 and enabled xft because firefox starts then and after all offical realeses seem to be built this way. The issues with faq.fedora.pl (see pld-users) and search engines crashing firefox

shaperd.2.spec

Few patches to shaperd.2: - updated to the latest snap - changed versioning scheme to enable updates (DDMMYY-YYMMDD) - passing and respecting CC and CFLAGS by make - fixed bug causing random crashes of shaperd (uninitialized var) - should be fixed in next realese. Please review the patches and

Re: lstat.spec

- disabled building lstat with mod_perl1 support (with mod_perl1 live graphs are not generated for me) Sorry, one more Req missing for apache1 build: apache1-mod_cgi. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org

php5.1 with apache1

# service apache start Starting apache service.[FAIL ] Processing config directory: /etc/apache/conf.d/*.conf Processing config file: /etc/apache/conf.d/01_mod_access.conf Processing config file: /etc/apache/conf.d/02_mod_alias.conf Processing config

Re: AC TODO [19/01/2006]

What about WindowMaker 0.92 from HEAD? It doesn't have full release. I'm using it on i686/athlon without problems and it fixes some minor bugs. If it's fine on other archs, it should go into ac. -- atler ___ pld-devel-en mailing list

ghc missing patches

As our ghc on ftp is missing libreadline.so.5 dependency I wanted to rebuild it myself and found that two patches are missing (ghc-system-libffi.patch, ghc-system-haddock.patch). Could somebody (glen?) add them to repo? ___ pld-devel-en mailing list

Re: HELP: New PLD Rescue CD

On 05.06.2010 19:15, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: New PLD RescueCD is hopefuly to be produced at the end of this month but areq needs help with fixing packages. Current set of problems is at: http://pld.areq.eu.org/th-i486h/problems/ Please help and commit fixes or email patches here.

texlive-jadetex fmt files

I'm not familiar with texlive.spec and fetching 1gb of texlive distribution just to test if a small commit works is not an option, so I'll ask here (uzsolt?). Our texlive-jadetex is missing fmt files (branch TEXLIVE_20080816, I don't care about HEAD as it's even bigger mess with jadetex files

Re: texlive-jadetex fmt files

On 21.09.2010 15:04, Jan Palus wrote: I'm not familiar with texlive.spec and fetching 1gb of texlive distribution just to test if a small commit works is not an option, so I'll ask here (uzsolt?). Our texlive-jadetex is missing fmt files (branch TEXLIVE_20080816, I don't care about HEAD

Re: /proc for docker

On 11.01.2014 19:44, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: root@e0ea0ce6904b:/# ls -l /proc ls: cannot access /proc/1: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /proc/10: No such file or directory Just a wild guess, but that reminds me of issues with our default mount option for /proc -- hidepid=2.

Building against ffmpeg with opencl

Hi, I'm trying to build new release of mpv against ffmpeg-2.2.5 which is now built with opencl. Unfortunately I get undefined symbols during linking: /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pld-linux/4.8.3/../../../../lib64/libavutil.so: undefined reference to `clReleaseMemObject@OPENCL_1.0'

Re: Building against ffmpeg with opencl

On 26.07.2014 15:48, Jan Palus wrote: On 26.07.2014 15:29, Jakub Bogusz wrote: (Side note: Mesa libOpenCL doesn't provide @OPENCL_1.0 versioning, AMD's (fglrx) IIRC does). Use ocl-icd libOpenCL, which redirects calls to selected target library (every implementation should provide

Re: Building against ffmpeg with opencl

On 26.07.2014 16:18, Jan Palus wrote: ok found the issue with OCL_ICD_DEBUG=2 - it turned out I had beignet package installed which provides ocl-icd vendor file. Is there any way to choose preferred vendor instead of running into such issues when one only wants to play a movie? One more

Re: [all] builder queue problem

On 11.11.2015 16:06, PLD all builder wrote: > there were problems sending files from queue > /home/pld/builderth/pld-builder.new/spool/notify: > problems: > [src: > /home/pld/builderth/pld-builder.new/spool/notify/897a4ea6-eea2-4ae7-9cdc-8b83a5f02230] > > (_ssl.c:581)> > [src: >

Re: consolekit

On 03.11.2015 11:22, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > well, my actual problem is that i can no longer suspend laptop from > mate. have to type "poweroff" command, very annoying! Just note from my side -- no issues with suspend/shutdown from mate here, though it looks I don't even have consolekit

Re: ERRORS: libmateweather.spec OK: libmatekbd.spec libmatemixer.spec mate-menus.spec

On 07.11.2015 12:28, PLD th-i686 builder wrote: > Conflicts: mate-applet-gweather < 1.6.1 > Processing files: libmateweather-devel-1.12.0-1.i686 > Segmentation fault > ended at: Sat Nov 7 13:27:32 2015, done in 0:04:49.335941 > error: No files produced. Can someone have a

Failed delivery of build request

015.08.30.06.17.49 > for <builde...@pld-linux.org> > (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); > Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:17:53 -0700 (PDT) > Sender: Jan Palus <jan.pa...@gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:17:49 +0200 > Fro

Re: RFC: default python installlation directories

Regarding migration to new %py_* macros -- is there a way to define setup.py options instead of "action" options? For example how to correctly migrate following invocation: %{__python} setup.py \ --no-compile-schemas \ --no-update-icon-cache \ install \ --optimize=2 \

Re: RFC: default python installlation directories

Are there any guidelines on how to adjust packages using automake for python installation? In particular those using AM_PATH_PYTHON which currently determines pythondir = ${prefix}/lib64/python3.5/site-packages while previously it was evaluated to %{prefix}/share/python3.5/site-packages. In my

building kernel modules

In latest VirtualBox release there was an issue with building kernel modules for LTS kernel 3.10 which was basically caused by missing KERNELRELEASE definition. Since for one module build depends on target kernel version, the decision was made incorrectly in the absence of above var. Now from top

Re: [packages/xorg-xserver-server] P: xorg-driver-video-modesetting, xorg-driver-video

On 24.11.2016 00:12, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 23.11.2016 17:16, atler wrote: > > # Usual desktop setups need least one video driver to run, see xorg.log > > which one exactly > > Suggests: xorg-driver-video > > +Provides: xorg-driver-video > > +Provides: xorg-driver-video-modesetting > >

Re: [packages/VirtualBox] do not package vboxvideo_drv; kernel driver is now preferred

On 23.11.2016 13:25, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > What about older kernels? Will 3.18, 4.1 or 4.4 work as well? I would assume so but didn't really check in practice. The only prerequisites are KMS in kernel (present in 3.18) and xorg's modesetting driver in userspace. From dependencies point of view

Re: [packages/VirtualBox] do not package vboxvideo_drv; kernel driver is now preferred

On 23.11.2016 15:16, Jan Palus wrote: > On 23.11.2016 13:25, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > What about older kernels? Will 3.18, 4.1 or 4.4 work as well? > > I would assume so but didn't really check in practice. The only > prerequisites are KMS in kernel (present in 3.18) and

Re: [packages/xorg-xserver-server] P: xorg-driver-video-modesetting, xorg-driver-video

On 24.11.2016 07:23, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > Suggests is no longer there, but anyway I assume you don't want xserver > > to provide video driver even though it provides video driver (so user > > can select some other one). I don't really care so if there are no > > objections I will

cpio: File digest mismatch

I've created a basic package for libguestfs fixed appliance (http://download.libguestfs.org/binaries/appliance/) however there seems to be an issue with how filesystem image is packaged by rpm. It's an ext2 fs file with size of 4G and only about ~256M used space: $ file root root: Linux rev

Re: Mesa 17.2 from th-test is broken

On 19.09.2017 18:02, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Xserver crashes for me after installing Mesa 17.2 from th-test Updating ati driver does not help. Arch has similar report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101832 initially fixed by disabling swr

Re: [packages/firefox] filterout -Werror=format-security to fix build with gcc7

On 27.08.2017 17:39, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: On Saturday 26 of August 2017, atler wrote: commit a132acc2832bf9003b9693a696c0cb6d96e44a5e Author: Jan Palus <at...@pld-linux.org> Date: Sat Aug 26 22:25:55 2017 +0200 filterout -Werror=format-security to fix build with gcc7 Why n

Re: [packages/kernel] - rel 1

On 13.11.2017 19:18, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > Good luck fixing almost all kernel module packages. > Looks like there are some really breaking API changes :( Note that it might be something with our packaging, macros, patches, other? (I'm clueless about kernel build system). After unpacking vanilla

Re: [packages/xorg-driver-video-nvidia] - drop ifarch mess and just make the package exclusevarch to x8664

On 06.05.2018 12:56, baggins wrote: > commit 2ea8529d8aa59a06136fff1888587dbb2c6ff24c > Author: Jan Rękorajski > Date: Sun May 6 12:55:39 2018 +0200 > > - drop ifarch mess and just make the package exclusevarch to x8664 The point of "ifarch mess" was to still be

Re: [packages/poppler61] compatibility package with last poppler version supporting qt4 api (0.61.0)

On 20.05.2018 21:21, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 09:11:52PM +0200, atler wrote: > > commit 48b431eaeb96e110b3654a9f5984ad9e655b98f1 > > Author: Jan Palus <at...@pld-linux.org> > > Date: Sun May 20 21:09:36 2018 +0200 > > > > compatib

Re: ERRORS: mate-applet-indicator.spec mate-terminal.spec mate-netbook.spec

On 19.06.2018 00:38, PLD th-x32 builder wrote: > poldek: Processing dependencies... > poldek: gtk+3-devel-3.22.30-1.x32 marks > gobject-introspection-devel-1.56.1-1.x32 (cap /usr/share/gir-1.0) > poldek: gobject-introspection-devel-1.56.1-1.x32 marks glibc-misc-2.27-9.x32 > (cap glibc-misc) >

Missing packages

On 25.06.2018 17:14, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote: > NetworkManager-applet.spec (HEAD): OK > > --- NetworkManager-applet.spec:HEAD: > upgrading packages > Preparing...## > NetworkManager-gtk-lib

Re: New NM 1.12 and OVPN

On 18.07.2018 10:18, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: >After upgrade to newest version of NM, plugin >NetworkManager-openvpn-1.8.4-1 doesn't work. >Plugin is too old? Try NetworkManager-1.12.0-2 once it's built. As a quick workaround in current release you can use: nmcli c up

Re: upgrade failed OK: openjpeg2.spec

Thanks. Done. One more related thing though - any idea why upgrade failed? On 31.08.2018 18:44, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote: > upgrading packages > error: Failed dependencies: > openjpeg2-progs = 2.3.0-2 is needed by openjpeg2-devel-2.3.0-2.x86_64 > package upgrade failed

Re: TEST build ERRORS: vlc.spec

On 01.09.2018 19:04, PLD th-x32 builder wrote: > /usr/libx32/qt5/bin/uic -tr "Q_" gui/qt/ui/open_capture.ui >> > gui/qt/ui/open_capture.h.tmp > /usr/libx32/qt5/bin/uic: relocation error: /usr/libx32/qt5/bin/uic: symbol > qt_qhash_seed version Qt_5 not defined in file libQt5Core.so.5 with link

Re: [packages/open-vm-tools] we don't provide vmxnet module, drop support for it

On 02.09.2018 18:06, adamg wrote: > commit 21d43020dfd7dc915c941739408c48f91b9681f5 > Author: Adam Gołębiowski > Date: Sun Sep 2 18:03:55 2018 +0200 > > we don't provide vmxnet module, drop support for it I'm not using PLD in VMware VM anymore, but please keep in mind vmxnet module is now

Re: TEST build ERRORS: fontconfig.spec

> 69f4b771-2f60-43f1-bcca-ece370059cce/tmp/B.af_pNM/BUILD/fontconfig-2.13.0/test/cache.dir/b9d99059-517f-4a54-9228-3fc60336fa91-le32d4.cache-7 > No permissions to creating new namespace, likely because the kernel does not > allow non-privileged user namespaces. On e.g. debian this can be enabled

Re: TEST build ERRORS: fontconfig.spec

On 10.03.2018 13:48, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote: > # FAIL: 1 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > See test/test-suite.log would someone with proper access be so kind to send me above file from any builder?

Re: [packages/libutf8proc] - rel 4; avoid includedir subdir (compatible with other distros)

On 14.04.2018 17:45, arekm wrote: > commit f8274d04fe4385692919d8ca584f1686c82fba29 > Author: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz > Date: Sat Apr 14 17:44:57 2018 +0200 > > - rel 4; avoid includedir subdir (compatible with other distros) Looks like someone else is also upgrading

Re: ERRORS: firefox.spec

On 25.09.2018 21:37, Jan Palus wrote: > On 25.09.2018 19:14, PLD th-i686 builder wrote: > > firefox.spec (auto/th/firefox-62.0.2-1): FAILED > > I got failed firefox build on i686 in some random place, followed by OK test > build, followed by this failure in another random place

Re: TEST build ERRORS: cups-filters.spec (PHP version on builders)

On 05.11.2018 11:45, PLD th-x32 builder wrote: > cups-filters.spec (HEAD): FAILED ... > installing BR: php55\-devel > + poldek --noask --caplookup -Q -v '--ignore=hhvm-*' '--ignore=php4-*' > '--ignore=php52-*' '--ignore=php54-*' '--ignore=php55-*' '--ignore=php56-*' > '--ignore=php70-*'

Re: TEST build ERRORS: poppler.spec

On 31.08.2018 17:19, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote: > CMake Error at /usr/lib64/openjpeg-2.3/OpenJPEGTargets.cmake:90 (message): > The imported target "openjp2_static" references the file > > "/usr/lib64/libopenjp2.a" > > but this file does not exist. Possible reasons include: > > *

Re: ERRORS: firefox.spec

On 25.09.2018 19:14, PLD th-i686 builder wrote: > firefox.spec (auto/th/firefox-62.0.2-1): FAILED I got failed firefox build on i686 in some random place, followed by OK test build, followed by this failure in another random place. Can someone have look at th-i686 builder? Is there any trace of

Re: DISTFILES: sqlite3: ERRORS: sqlite-src-3260000.zip

On 13.12.2018 12:28, atler wrote: > Request by: atler > > sqlite3: undefined macro lua:vn=rpm.expand("%vnum");v="";for i in > string.gmatch(string.format("%08d", vn), "..") do v=v.."."..i:gsub("^0", > "");end;v=v:gsub("^.",""):gsub("\.0$","");print(v) > > > > Files fetched: 0 > > ALREADY

Re: DISTFILES: sqlite3: ERRORS: sqlite-src-3260000.zip

On 13.12.2018 12:37, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > On 13/12/2018 12:30, Jan Palus wrote: > > On 13.12.2018 12:28, atler wrote: > >> Request by: atler > >> > >> sqlite3: undefined macro lua:vn=rpm.expand("%vnum");v="";for i in > >> s

Re: PLD-doc: PLD-update-TODO - updated

Is this update job working correctly? Just few examples that are out of date: avfs(11) [OLD] 1.0.0 [NEW] 1.0.6 --> 1.0.6 is in Git for a week now ell(12) [OLD] 0.12 [NEW] 0.14 --> the latest version is 0.15 not 0.14 and 0.15 is in repo for 2 weeks now

Re: [packages/qt5-qtbase] build without statx to support kernels older than 4.11

On 21.03.2019 09:58, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > On 21/03/2019 00:35, atler wrote: > > commit fc41f21cbe3529378b0600ec3e027668b7f878d4 > > Author: Jan Palus > > Date: Thu Mar 21 00:30:10 2019 +0100 > > > > build without statx to support kernels older

Missing buildlogs

Looks like starting with gcc build (https://srcbuilder.pld-linux.org/th/queue.html#184029) buildlogs went missing. Can someone check? ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: Missing buildlogs

On 24.02.2019 13:25, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 12:57:05PM +0100, Jan Palus wrote: > > Looks like starting with gcc build > > (https://srcbuilder.pld-linux.org/th/queue.html#184029) > > buildlogs went missing. Can someone check? > > Probably becaus

freshness' freshness

For some time now it seems that freshness report does not include new changes, any idea what happened? http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness Sample missing packages: libbluray tasksh glib-networking gobject-introspection vala gvfs libinput vte mate-icon-theme

Re: freshness' freshness

On 11.04.2019 13:00, glen wrote: > seems ok now. > > > new commit created as: > > git diff 625690e48..96bb43df4 thanks! ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: [packages/systemd] continue using hybrid cgroup hierarchy

On 04.09.2019 08:01, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > On 03/09/2019 23:13, atler wrote: > > commit d43959e98fc5590888c9a43d2345178c34e4f2c4 > > Author: Jan Palus > > Date: Tue Sep 3 23:08:49 2019 +0200 > > > > continue using hybrid cgroup hierarchy > >

Re: TEST build ERRORS: kf5-ktexteditor.spec

On 25.07.2019 19:57, PLD th-i686 builder wrote: > -DQT_NO_DEBUG -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,--fatal-warnings ... > /usr/bin/ld: warning: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: corrupt GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE (5) size: > 0 > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status any idea why /lib/ld-linux.so.2 appears to be broken on

Re: git push: No space left on device

Happened again: Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 316 bytes | 316.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: fatal: write failure on

package missing on github mirror

Just got following error when pushing to dxr2-driver: Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 311 bytes | 311.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta

Re: package missing on github mirror

On 18.05.2020 11:34, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > Since commit reached git.pld-linux.org just fine, I believe the issue is > > caused > > by missing package on github: > > > > https://github.com/pld-linux/dxr2-driver > > > repo created > > > ``` > > > root@1822-cvs hooks/post-receive.d# sudo

Re: [packages/rust-cbindgen] add aarch64 to supported archs

On 06.05.2020 09:26, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 5/3/20 9:05 PM, atler wrote: > > > commit dbd044c3e9564926c69806df3133b1322dd32d0b > > Author: Jan Palus > > Date: Sun May 3 20:02:33 2020 +0200 > > > > add aarch64 to supported archs > > are

Re: kwin with new Mesa

On 11.05.2020 10:01, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: >On 07.05.2020 23:20, Jan Palus wrote: > > On 06.05.2020 13:04, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: > >Hi, > >after upgrade Mesa* to 20.0.6, kwin dies as below: > > >From which version you have upgraded (wha

Re: libc 2.31/i686: operation not permitted for preserving timestamps

On 24.03.2020 21:20, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > does i686 even work for someone really? > > > some errors here and there FWIW my up-to-date i686 VM (QEMU) used for package testing purposes works fine. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list

Re: kwin with new Mesa

On 06.05.2020 13:04, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: >Hi, > >after upgrade Mesa* to 20.0.6, kwin dies as below: >From which version you have upgraded (what was the last working version)? Which GPU? What driver? Is there anything in xorg log? Is there anything in dmesg? Can you provide stack

chroot for aarch64

For the last couple of days I've been boostrapping PLD for aarch64 and I'm happy to report that my Pinebook Pro boots into PLD now (with just a little help from Manjaro's kernel and wifi firmware). Basically everything works fine including, but not limited to: rpm, poldek, X, Mesa, MATE, firefox,

Re: [packages/rpm-pld-macros] - version 1.749: fixed _ver_* macros

On 27.09.2020 20:17, qboosh wrote: > commit a04002a841905f8c84ca1c955e047676994c1ef2 > Author: Jakub Bogusz > Date: Sun Sep 27 20:20:03 2020 +0200 > > - version 1.749: fixed _ver_* macros ... > -# BuildRequires: rpmbuild(macros) >= 1.748 > -%_ver_lt() %(test rpmvercmp "%{1}" "%{2}"

Re: rpm.org's rpm 4.16.0 ready for testing

On 24.10.2020 17:15, Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: > I have prepared rpm 4.16, poldek and support packages, they are > available on http://ftp1.pld-linux.org/people/baggins/rpm.org/ > > I would appreciate if you could test the uprade path, functionality > and tell me if anything is

Re: rpm.org's rpm 4.16.0 ready for testing

On 24.10.2020 17:15, Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: > I have prepared rpm 4.16, poldek and support packages, they are > available on http://ftp1.pld-linux.org/people/baggins/rpm.org/ > > I would appreciate if you could test the uprade path, functionality > and tell me if anything is

Re: [packages/rpm/rpm.org] - drop lua hacks and look for default lua version - don't obsolete rpm-getdeps, this rpm does not su

On 24.10.2020 16:12, baggins wrote: > commit be07e71c8acd92e61d42ccb1c92200f92ed152c9 > Author: Jan Rękorajski > Date: Sat Oct 24 15:50:57 2020 +0200 > > - drop lua hacks and look for default lua version > -BuildRequires: lua53-devel >= 5.3.5 > +BuildRequires: lua-devel >= 5.1

Re: [packages/qt4] - icu 67 rebuild - release 28 (by relup.sh)

On 07.07.2020 12:30, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: >Hi! > >After upgrade that package KDE4 stop working - flood of core dumps. > >Maybe rebuilding KDE4 is enough to fix this issue? > >ps. I don't have stack trace. kde4/qt4 should either get a maintainer -- I propose you -- or be

Re: [packages/systemd] - this version is broken in an interesting way, rebooted during upgrade and then became unable to

On 10.06.2020 09:35, baggins wrote: > commit bcc348b831315aef4775c2f8f9c3b349b3337d5b > Author: Jan Rękorajski > Date: Wed Jun 10 09:35:13 2020 +0200 > > - this version is broken in an interesting way, rebooted during upgrade > and then became unable to boot fully Any clue what went

Re: [packages/systemd] - this version is broken in an interesting way, rebooted during upgrade and then became unable to

On 12.06.2020 20:01, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > Yes, there must be some intricate issue when updating from 244 to 245. > Updating 245 to 245 shows no side effects, clean restart. > > If you know of anything I should look at, or have any pointers where > should I dig, I'm open to suggestions. The

iptables-nft broken?

Does iptables-nft work for anyone in PLD? iptables-nft -L is supposed to create table/chains already but it does nothing. Same for any iptables-nft -A No errors just nothing. If I create INPUT chain and add single rule manually with nft then I can see it in iptables-nft -L. Almost as if

Re: rpm4 on carme*

If commit message includes '%' then rpmbuild spawned by builder script fails. See ie test.spec which includes '%prep': error: line 40: second %prep builder creates spec copy with %changelog appended. Apparently rpm.org evaluates macros in %changelog while rpm5 does not. Not sure whether we're

Re: rpm4 on carme*

On 18.12.2020 20:31, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, Jan Palus via pld-devel-en wrote: > > > Looks like poldek does not recognize R:(post, postun) and fails to > > install packages even though dependencies are present: > > > > $ ag '^R.*post' mpd.sp

Re: problem with mpd and libvirt

On 15.12.2020 12:48, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 15.12.2020 10:51, Jan Palus wrote: > > > On 14.12.2020 23:19, Krzysztof Mrozowicz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I upgraded my PLD installation with today's "ready" repo and just > > > discovered

Re: problem with mpd and libvirt

On 14.12.2020 23:19, Krzysztof Mrozowicz wrote: > Hi, > I upgraded my PLD installation with today's "ready" repo and just discovered > that two services I use started to segfault. > > libvirtd: > gru 14 23:06:34 oko libvirtd[22095]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU > binary

Re: rpm4 on carme*

On 06.11.2020 20:49, Jan Palus wrote: > On 27.10.2020 23:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report > > any issues. > > * poldek appears to still enforce directory deps while rpms does not > (that concerns m

Re: rpm4 on carme*

On 10.11.2020 18:18, Jan Palus wrote: > On 06.11.2020 20:49, Jan Palus wrote: > > On 27.10.2020 23:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report > > > any issues. > > > > * poldek appears to still

Re: rpm4 on carme*

* adding to the list of invalid chars in Obsoletes: '/' (msmtp: Obsoletes: /usr/lib/sendmail) * python-Cython built with rpm.org has weird unsatisfied R: python2.7dist(setuptools) / python3.8dist(setuptools) python-setuptools built with rpm.org does not have such P:

Re: th-i686 not working again

On 20.11.2020 21:04, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 20.11.2020 o 20:48, Jakub Bogusz pisze: > > It seems that th-i686 builder is dead or got stuck on openjdk11 build. > > > > Who can fix it? > > I but only on the site (if at all). It doesn't see disks (in bios). > > Maybe I'll get there

Re: rpm4 on carme*

On 27.10.2020 23:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report > any issues. * poldek appears to still enforce directory deps while rpms does not (that concerns mainly /usr/lib/.build-id subdirs) * rpm.org is missing %{__ln} macro. spotted

Re: [packages/kf5-kcontacts] - Initial version - ka5-kcontacts is now kf5-kcontacts.

On 10.01.2021 23:24, lmasko wrote: > commit dafe4e812b30fb4c82eb24be3b726bc549b64210 > Author: Łukasz Maśko > Date: Sun Jan 10 23:23:28 2021 +0100 > > - Initial version - ka5-kcontacts is now kf5-kcontacts. > > kf5-kcontacts.spec | 85 >

Re: audacity 2.4.x and wxWidgets

On 22.01.2021 10:08, Krzysztof Mrozowicz wrote: > Hi, > I updated audacity spec to version 2.4.2, but during the work I found that > this version no longer compiles on 32 bits. I don't know what exactly should > be added to the spec file to inform builders to do not try to build it on >

Re: git default branch

On 02.02.2021 14:30, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 02.02.2021 o 14:11, Jan Palus pisze: > > Could someone please silent this hint? FWIW "master" is still perfectly > > fine as far as I'm concerned. > > > > $ git pld init alacritty > > hint: Using

git default branch

Could someone please silent this hint? FWIW "master" is still perfectly fine as far as I'm concerned. $ git pld init alacritty hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. This default branch name hint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use in all hint: of

Re: [packages/php] - drop if clause introduced in commit 20dcadbb (guard clause for rpm 4.16), we have fully transiti

On 15.05.2021 11:44, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 10:41 AM Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > > > > > W dniu 2021-05-15 o 15:26, Neal Gompa pisze: > > > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 6:23 AM Adam Gołębiowski > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> W dniu 2021-05-15 o 11:52, Neal Gompa pisze: > > >>> On

Re: [packages/rust] bump required libgit2 version

On 27.05.2021 17:05, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:19 PM atler wrote: > > > commit 1f9b856019ac20736ccec408a735866922e0748a > > Author: Jan Palus > > Date: Thu May 27 16:18:28 2021 +0200 > > > > bump required libgit2 version >

Re: rust on x32

On 25.05.2021 10:17, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > Hi, > > Could someone with rust build chain knowlegde look at rust on x32? > > My findings so far are that it does not build with target > x86_64-...-gnux32, so we would have to build the compiler for x86_64 and > just the stdlib for gnux32, the docs

Re: [packages/rust] - relax internal deps

On 28.05.2021 12:30, baggins wrote: > commit 89a1e043707dd595670e060055d7f14359d1f4d6 > Author: Jan Rękorajski > Date: Fri May 28 12:29:33 2021 +0200 > > - relax internal deps > > rust.spec | 10 +- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > --- > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@

Re: TEST build ERRORS: expat.spec

On 24.05.2021 10:12, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote: > Processing dependencies... > There are 1 package to install: > A docbook2X-0.8.8-6.x86_64 > This operation will use 1.3MB of disk space. > docbook2X-0.8.8-6.x86_64.rpm: digests OK > Need to get 291.2KB of archives. >

Re: problem with firefox 88

On 04.05.2021 21:10, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: W dniu 03.05.2021 o 22:22, Krzysztof Mrozowicz pisze: W dniu 03.05.2021 o 22:11, Krzysztof Mrozowicz pisze: Hi, I just upgraded firefox to version 88 and discovered its interface doesn't respond to clicking and in the terminal I

Re: problem with firefox 88

On 05.05.2021 12:50, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: W dniu 05.05.2021 o 11:35, Jan Palus pisze: Downgraded to version 87 and happy days. Works for me. Did you try with fresh profile (firefox -ProfileManager), mozilla's binary (package mozilla-firefox-bin) and in case it still

Re: problem with firefox 88

On 05.05.2021 13:44, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: W dniu 05.05.2021 o 12:08, Jan Palus pisze: On 05.05.2021 12:50, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: W dniu 05.05.2021 o 11:35, Jan Palus pisze: Downgraded to version 87 and happy days. Works for me. Did you try

Re: sudo after upgrade

On 02.02.2021 20:45, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: >Hi, > >I've just upgrade to newest test and after restart I'm not at wheel >group anymore > >id zawada >uid=1000(zawada) gid=1000(users) grupy=1000(users) > >but: > >cat /etc/group|grep zawada >

Re: sudo after upgrade

On 08.02.2021 14:46, Jan Palus wrote: > On 02.02.2021 20:45, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I've just upgrade to newest test and after restart I'm not at wheel > >group anymore > > > >id zawada > >uid=

Re: [packages/rpm] - x32 patch fixes

On 23.03.2021 08:53, baggins wrote: > commit b10d9d9e984edbf3157c9fee959c0868486a2f93 > Author: Jan Rękorajski > Date: Tue Mar 23 08:52:27 2021 +0100 > > - x32 patch fixes > > x32.patch | 10 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > --- > diff --git a/x32.patch

Re: [packages/rpm] - x32 patch fixes

On 23.03.2021 14:44, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 1:59 PM Jan Palus wrote: > > > On 23.03.2021 08:53, baggins wrote: > > > commit b10d9d9e984edbf3157c9fee959c0868486a2f93 > > > Author: Jan Rękorajski > > > Date: Tue Mar 23 08:52:27

Re: [packages/rpm-pld-macros] initial basic rust/cargo macros (2.003)

On 30.03.2021 18:44, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 30.03.2021 14:06, atler wrote: > > > commit 593b448d587953c0aa5cfb8484485fda26499d3c > > Author: Jan Palus > > Date: Tue Mar 30 12:59:03 2021 +0200 > > > > initial basic rust/cargo macros (2.003)

Re: [projects/template-specs] use %cargo_* macros

On 30.03.2021 20:57, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:46:46PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > [...] > > >@@ -40,19 +41,17 @@ EOF > > > %build > > > export CARGO_HOME="$(pwd)/.cargo" > > > > > >-cargo -v build \ > > >+%cargo_build \ > > > %ifarch x32 > > > --target

chroot for armv6hl

For anyone interested, PLD chroot is now available for armv6hl in addition to aarch64. Both can be downloaded at: https://github.com/jpalus/pld-linux-arm/releases PLD has been happily powering my Raspberry Pi 2 and Zero for a while now. ___

Re: [packages/poldek] skip /usr/lib/.build-id when processing obsoletes

On 16.03.2021 13:31, atler wrote: > commit aba59b953581b330457d7e6f0ea3e1ab648f80a7 > Author: Jan Palus > Date: Tue Mar 16 13:28:50 2021 +0100 > > skip /usr/lib/.build-id when processing obsoletes > > fixes major performance regression when changing

Re: ca-certs for https://git.php.net

On 12.03.2021 10:40, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > $ curl https://git.php.net/repository/pecl/encryption/mcrypt.git > curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate > More details here: https://curl.se/docs/sslcerts.html > > curl failed to verify the legitimacy of the server

  1   2   >