Re: builders->ftp uploads defunct

2024-04-22 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 22/04/2024 20:58, Jakub Bogusz wrote: Since Saturday new packages don't appear in th-test. Could it be fixed? ENOSPC on ftp disk and stale locks... fixed. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) ___ pld-devel-en mailing

builders->ftp uploads defunct

2024-04-22 Thread Jakub Bogusz
Since Saturday new packages don't appear in th-test. Could it be fixed? -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: [packages/xz] Revert back to 5.4.6 as 5.6.x are BACKDOORED! https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29

2024-03-30 Thread Mateusz Kocielski
Dnia Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:57:22PM +0100, Jan Palus napisał(a): > On 30.03.2024 01:49, arekm wrote: > > commit b369fe78b7b4a02e900fb6fe7ac035a9bba39436 > > Author: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz > > Date: Fri Mar 29 23:50:59 2024 +0100 > > > > Revert back to 5.4.6 as 5.6.x are BACKDOORED! > >

Re: [packages/xz] Revert back to 5.4.6 as 5.6.x are BACKDOORED! https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29

2024-03-30 Thread Jan Palus
On 30.03.2024 01:49, arekm wrote: > commit b369fe78b7b4a02e900fb6fe7ac035a9bba39436 > Author: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz > Date: Fri Mar 29 23:50:59 2024 +0100 > > Revert back to 5.4.6 as 5.6.x are BACKDOORED! > https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4 > > xz.spec | 4 ++-- >

Re: [packages/python3] python points to python3 now

2024-03-25 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 25/03/2024 10:22, Jan Palus wrote: On 25.03.2024 11:05, arekm wrote: commit d073fb40c26996aedc0c52fdea5af8b596e4f395 Author: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz Date: Mon Mar 25 09:58:15 2024 +0100 python points to python3 now python3.spec | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) --- diff

Re: [packages/python3] python points to python3 now

2024-03-25 Thread Jan Palus
On 25.03.2024 11:05, arekm wrote: > commit d073fb40c26996aedc0c52fdea5af8b596e4f395 > Author: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz > Date: Mon Mar 25 09:58:15 2024 +0100 > > python points to python3 now > > python3.spec | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > --- > diff --git a/python3.spec

Re: [packages/gobject-introspection] - updated to 1.80.0; added bootstrap bcond for glib 2.78->2.80 transition

2024-03-10 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 10:56:22AM +0100, Jan Palus wrote: > Shouldn't it be the other way around -- "bootstrap" bcond in glib2 for > building without introspection? Currently while gobject-introspection > does not build-time depend on glib2-devel >= 2.80, it does runtime > depend on glib2 >= 2.80

Re: [packages/gobject-introspection] - updated to 1.80.0; added bootstrap bcond for glib 2.78->2.80 transition

2024-03-10 Thread Jan Palus
On 09.03.2024 22:33, qboosh wrote: > commit a0c12f9cf03d0222dbb6357f6da0f70e72260664 > Author: Jakub Bogusz > Date: Sat Mar 9 22:31:00 2024 +0100 > > - updated to 1.80.0; added bootstrap bcond for glib 2.78->2.80 transition > > gobject-introspection.spec | 55 >

Re: [packages/kf5-attica] - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1

2024-02-06 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 03:04:21PM +0100, Witold Filipczyk via pld-devel-en wrote: > Dnia Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:56:25PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a): > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:39:39PM +0100, witekfl wrote: > > > commit 3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486 > > > Author: Witold

Re: TEST build ERRORS: test.spec

2024-02-05 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 05/02/2024 02:02, Jan Palus wrote: I've tried to replicate the env (i686 VM, XFS) but without success. Not sure if it's block device driver? XFS? or something else? Can't do much more without ability to reproduce. Any ideas are welcome. All builders run on the same physical machine as VMs

Re: TEST build ERRORS: test.spec

2024-02-04 Thread Jan Palus
On 05.02.2024 00:50, PLD th-i686 builder wrote: > test.spec (cryptsetup-debug): FAILED ... > + test cafa743b687f1581b71a20ebfc068f9fe12653e945c417311b861c9217e66adf '=' > 06e2f159d6d541169da75222a7f0bedd0fc700502d63809f577b48f41eace335 Something concerning is going on i686/x32 builders. All

Re: [packages/kf5-attica] - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1

2024-02-04 Thread Witold Filipczyk via pld-devel-en
Dnia Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:56:25PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a): > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:39:39PM +0100, witekfl wrote: > > commit 3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486 > > Author: Witold Filipczyk > > Date: Sat Feb 3 20:24:04 2024 +0100 > > > > - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1 > >

Re: [packages/kf5-attica] - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1

2024-02-03 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:39:39PM +0100, witekfl wrote: > commit 3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486 > Author: Witold Filipczyk > Date: Sat Feb 3 20:24:04 2024 +0100 > > - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1 > > kf5-attica.spec | 41 - > 1 file

Re: New packages not available on ftp

2024-02-01 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 02/02/2024 00:14, Jan Palus wrote: None of packages built today on builders is available on ftp. Can someone check? Something bad happened on ep09 machine (which is main ftp machine; doesn't let ssh in; disconnects). No idea who else beside RMF has access to console on this VM. --

New packages not available on ftp

2024-02-01 Thread Jan Palus
None of packages built today on builders is available on ftp. Can someone check? ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: [packages/pam] - add triggers for removed modules

2024-01-06 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Fri, 05 Jan 2024, Jan Palus wrote: > On 23.12.2023 10:53, baggins wrote: > > commit 201cb6739a14557a0ec8bf7c3dd171b4fc06afeb > > Author: Jan Rękorajski > > Date: Sat Dec 23 09:24:52 2023 +0100 > > > > - add triggers for removed modules > > > > pam.spec | 10 +- > > 1 file

Re: [packages/pam] - add triggers for removed modules

2024-01-05 Thread Jan Palus
On 23.12.2023 10:53, baggins wrote: > commit 201cb6739a14557a0ec8bf7c3dd171b4fc06afeb > Author: Jan Rękorajski > Date: Sat Dec 23 09:24:52 2023 +0100 > > - add triggers for removed modules > > pam.spec | 10 +- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > --- > diff --git

Re: DISTFILES: ccache: ERRORS: ccache-4.9.tar.xz

2023-12-31 Thread Jan Palus
On 31.12.2023 13:10, atler wrote: > Request by: atler > > scp problems: scp -pr -B -q > ./tmp/a3fa32b0-8779-4bcb-a2b9-de2c39648f88/6eeab51025bb3492aa197d7d32be3184/ > pldd...@distfiles.pld-linux.org:ftp//by-md5/6/e: > scp: Connection closed > > The command has exited with a non-zero status. >

PLD New Rescue Th-20231129

2023-11-29 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
https://github.com/pld-linux-org/pld-new-rescue/releases/tag/th-current-20231129 Based on Th main 20231129 tree. kernel 6.5.5 glibc 2.38 rpm 4.17.1.1 openssl 3.1.4 -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) ___ pld-devel-en

Retired packages after ffmpeg update

2023-11-05 Thread Jan Rękorajski
The packages listed below will be removed from Th as they either do not build at all or do not build with ffmpeg 6. All of them are unmaintined antiques (no upstream updates for 5-10 years), and fixing them would require too much effort, especially that for most of them replacements exist.

Re: [packages/mysql] Started work on 8.1.0 upgrade and also started making this package coinstallable with other mysql/ma

2023-10-20 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:01:56PM +0200, arekm wrote: > commit 616994dbf9872356085c234c4c1efaa050d74ce3 > Author: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz > Date: Fri Oct 20 19:01:24 2023 +0200 > > Started work on 8.1.0 upgrade and also started making this package > coinstallable with other

Re: [packages/shared-mime-info] fix build with doc; rel 2

2023-10-09 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:59:52PM +0200, atler wrote: > commit dabbd0362fbd2a2345f450a5efceb62eb321741b > Author: Jan Palus > Date: Mon Oct 9 14:11:26 2023 +0200 > > fix build with doc; rel 2 > > replace unicode apostrophe with ascii one. from: >

Re: i3lock - spec file

2023-07-12 Thread Jan Palus
On 12.07.2023 17:10, Mateusz Kocielski wrote: > Dnia Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 01:22:08PM +0200, Jan Palus napisał(a): > > > > Override pam configuration shipped with i3lock with custom one that has: > > > > auth include system-auth > > > > just like (all?) other screensavers/lockers and

Re: i3lock - spec file

2023-07-12 Thread Mateusz Kocielski
Dnia Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 01:22:08PM +0200, Jan Palus napisał(a): > > Override pam configuration shipped with i3lock with custom one that has: > > auth include system-auth > > just like (all?) other screensavers/lockers and it should be fine. > > Other than this > > 1. Fix case in

Re: i3lock - spec file

2023-07-12 Thread Jan Palus
On 11.07.2023 20:30, Mateusz Kocielski wrote: > Dnia Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 03:59:41PM +, Mateusz Kocielski napisał(a): > > > That's peculiar -- what screen locker needs suid bit for? Why wheel > > > group? > > > > Wheel group is taken from my BSD heritage I guess, fixed it. :) It requires > >

Re: i3lock - spec file

2023-07-11 Thread Mateusz Kocielski
Dnia Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 03:59:41PM +, Mateusz Kocielski napisał(a): > > That's peculiar -- what screen locker needs suid bit for? Why wheel > > group? > > Wheel group is taken from my BSD heritage I guess, fixed it. :) It requires > PAM for an authentication. > > > >

Re: i3lock - spec file

2023-07-11 Thread Mateusz Kocielski
Dnia Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 01:36:19PM +0200, Jan Palus napisał(a): > Hi, > > thanks for contributing! Overall looks good. Some comments below. > Hello, thanks for your helpful comments, below my comments and fixed version of the spec. > > Summary:improved screen locker > > Start summary

Re: i3lock - spec file

2023-07-11 Thread Jan Palus
Hi, thanks for contributing! Overall looks good. Some comments below. On 11.07.2023 10:29, Mateusz Kocielski wrote: > Hi there, > > I've prepared spec file to build i3lock [1]. This is my first spec file, so > please review it carefully. The software requires suid to be able to verify >

openssh - move ssh-pkcs11-helper to client package

2023-07-11 Thread Mateusz Kocielski
Hello, currently ssh-pkcs11-helper(8) is a part of the server package, but it's used by client package utilities, thus it makes more sense to put it there. Attached trivial patch fixes it. Thanks, Mateusz >From 4b8e358a642d20e4af84a4c2fa4c043c987ad7d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mateusz

Re: Wrong time (Re: DISTFILES: freetype: freetype-2.13.1.tar.xz freetype-doc-2.13.1.tar.xz ft2demos-2.13.1.tar.xz)

2023-06-30 Thread Jan Palus
On 26.06.2023 10:38, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > On 26.06.2023 10:31, atler wrote: > > On 26.06.2023 11:24, atler wrote: > > > Request by: atler > > > > > > > > > Files fetched: 1 > > > > > > ALREADY GOT: > > >

Re: Wrong time (Re: DISTFILES: freetype: freetype-2.13.1.tar.xz freetype-doc-2.13.1.tar.xz ft2demos-2.13.1.tar.xz)

2023-06-26 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 26.06.2023 10:31, atler wrote: On 26.06.2023 11:24, atler wrote: Request by: atler Files fetched: 1 ALREADY GOT: https://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/freetype/freetype-2.13.1.tar.xz e4c3f0d8453a2a7993ae784912d6f19a freetype-2.13.1.tar.xz STORED:

Wrong time (Re: DISTFILES: freetype: freetype-2.13.1.tar.xz freetype-doc-2.13.1.tar.xz ft2demos-2.13.1.tar.xz)

2023-06-26 Thread atler
On 26.06.2023 11:24, atler wrote: > Request by: atler > > > Files fetched: 1 > > ALREADY GOT: > https://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/freetype/freetype-2.13.1.tar.xz > e4c3f0d8453a2a7993ae784912d6f19a freetype-2.13.1.tar.xz > STORED: >

Re: Inconsistent repo metadata

2023-06-24 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Sat, 24 Jun 2023, Jan Palus wrote: > $ dnf clean all > $ dnf download rpm-whiteout > PLD Linux (Th) - Architecture specific > 16 MB/s | 17 MB 00:01 > PLD Linux (Th) - Architecture independent

Inconsistent repo metadata

2023-06-24 Thread Jan Palus
$ dnf clean all $ dnf download rpm-whiteout PLD Linux (Th) - Architecture specific 16 MB/s | 17 MB 00:01 PLD Linux (Th) - Architecture independent 13 MB/s | 17 MB 00:01

Re: remmina not working after llvm upgrade

2023-05-26 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
On 26.05.2023 02:18, Jan Palus wrote: On 25.05.2023 15:41, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: Dnia 2023-05-25, o godz. 14:59:56 Jan Palus [1] napisal/(a): Yes, that's after reboot. Could be Mesa, it's upgraded too.. Do you mind sharing output (remmina.strace) of: strace -o

Re: remmina not working after llvm upgrade

2023-05-25 Thread Jan Palus
On 25.05.2023 15:41, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > Dnia 2023-05-25, o godz. 14:59:56 > Jan Palus napisał(a): > > > > > > >Yes, that's after reboot. Could be Mesa, it's upgraded too.. > > > > Do you mind sharing output (remmina.strace) of: > > > > strace -o remmina.strace

Re: remmina not working after llvm upgrade

2023-05-25 Thread Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en
Dnia 2023-05-25, o godz. 14:59:56 Jan Palus napisał(a): > > > >Yes, that's after reboot. Could be Mesa, it's upgraded too.. > > Do you mind sharing output (remmina.strace) of: > > strace -o remmina.strace -f -e '/open.*' -z remmina I observe a similar problem on my computer. The strace

Re: remmina not working after llvm upgrade

2023-05-25 Thread Jan Palus
On 25.05.2023 13:14, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: >On 25.05.2023 12:35, Jan Palus wrote: > > On 25.05.2023 12:04, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: > >Hi! > >$ remmina >** Message: 11:54:59.423: Remmina does not log all output statements. >Turn on more verbose output by using

Re: remmina not working after llvm upgrade

2023-05-25 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
On 25.05.2023 12:35, Jan Palus wrote: On 25.05.2023 12:04, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: Hi! $ remmina ** Message: 11:54:59.423: Remmina does not log all output statements. Turn on more verbose output by using "G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all" as an environment variable. More info available

Re: remmina not working after llvm upgrade

2023-05-25 Thread Jan Palus
On 25.05.2023 12:04, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: >Hi! > >$ remmina >** Message: 11:54:59.423: Remmina does not log all output statements. >Turn on more verbose output by using "G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all" as an >environment variable. >More info available on the Remmina wiki at: >

remmina not working after llvm upgrade

2023-05-25 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
Hi! $ remmina ** Message: 11:54:59.423: Remmina does not log all output statements. Turn on more verbose output by using "G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all" as an environment variable. More info available on the Remmina wiki at:

itstool 2.0.7 vs [packages/mate-utils] up to 1.26.1

2023-05-10 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:07:32AM +0200, atler wrote: > commit 8aa16867d2911b7b77adf7d0041e2b455f560fc9 > Author: Jan Palus > Date: Wed May 10 10:07:19 2023 +0200 > > up to 1.26.1 > > mate-utils.spec | 4 ++-- It (usually) fails for me with itstool 2.0.7. With itstool 2.0.6 it

Re: Qt packaging

2023-03-25 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:03:54AM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? Beside build time and space requirements, I see one more reason now: rebuilding after dependent package soname change is more painful. Current case: jasper 3.x.

Re: GitHub key needs an update

2023-03-24 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 24.03.2023 12:42, Jan Palus wrote: That's expected and GitHub host key needs an update, see: https://github.blog/2023-03-23-we-updated-our-rsa-ssh-host-key/ Updated. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) ___ pld-devel-en

GitHub key needs an update

2023-03-24 Thread Jan Palus
With each push following is logged from github mirror sync: remote: Pushing to github mirror... remote: @@@ remote: @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ remote:

PLD Linux script for installation

2023-02-27 Thread Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat
Hi, There was once a script to install PLD from another linux distribution but it seems dead now . I am requesting that such new script will be of great help because installation from a rescue CD is very difficult and tricky. Thanks, -- Dr.Saleem Khan Marwat Abbottabad Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa

Re: [packages/rpm-pld-macros] Add _metainfodir, rev 2.023

2023-02-22 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 22.02.2023 21:38, Jan Palus wrote: On 22.02.2023 19:55, glen wrote: commit fa6a978633bd3fbae3c510fb6299ddb67af8da00 Author: Elan Ruusamäe Date: Wed Feb 22 20:54:40 2023 +0200 Add _metainfodir, rev 2.023 -

Re: [packages/rpm-pld-macros] Add _metainfodir, rev 2.023

2023-02-22 Thread Jan Palus
On 22.02.2023 19:55, glen wrote: > commit fa6a978633bd3fbae3c510fb6299ddb67af8da00 > Author: Elan Ruusamäe > Date: Wed Feb 22 20:54:40 2023 +0200 > > Add _metainfodir, rev 2.023 > > - >

compileall.compile_dir(..., workers=2) fails in carme (vserver guest)

2023-02-22 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
this fails on carme. anything can be done with this? ➔ python3 -c "import compileall; import sys; compileall.compile_dir(sys.argv[1], workers=2)" /usr/share/empty/ Traceback (most recent call last):   File "", line 1, in   File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/compileall.py", line 102, in compile_dir   

ruby packages building from .gem

2023-02-18 Thread Jakub Bogusz
How is it supposed to work (taking ruby-ffi.spec as example)? .gem itself is tar archive containing metadata.gz and data.tar.gz. But rpm uses "gem unpack", which unpacks data.tar.gz from inside. And build fails with: + cd ffi-1.9.25 + /usr/lib/rpm/gem_helper.rb spec

Re: [packages/texlive/TEXLIVE_20080816] fix "sh: syntax error: unexpected '('" during file processing

2023-02-13 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 30.01.2023 14:26, atler wrote: -%define_noautoreq 'perl(path_tre)' +%define_noautoreq perl\\(path_tre\\) just use _noautoreq_perl ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org

Re: lists test

2023-02-08 Thread Łukasz Jernaś
W dniu wt., 7.02.2023 o 21:37 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en < pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org> napisał(a): > 123... Nope, doesn't work. -- Łukasz [Deejay1] Jernaś ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org

Re: lists test

2023-02-07 Thread Peri Noid
Dnia wtorek, 7 lutego 2023 21:37:29 CET Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en pisze: > 123... Seems to work. -- Łukasz Maśko_o) Lukasz.Masko(at)ipipan.waw.pl /\\ Registered Linux User #61028

lists test

2023-02-07 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
123... -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rust on carme-x32

2023-01-21 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 20.01.2023 22:04, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 09:14:51AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: On 18.01.2023 16:08, Jakub Bogusz wrote: Could rust be installed on carme-x32? I'd like to (try to) fix mozjs102 build (required for new gjs), but I cannot install

Re: rust on carme-x32

2023-01-20 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 09:14:51AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > On 18.01.2023 16:08, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > >Could rust be installed on carme-x32? > > > >I'd like to (try to) fix mozjs102 build (required for new gjs), but > >I cannot install rust myself because of x86_64

Re: rust on carme-x32

2023-01-19 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 18.01.2023 16:08, Jakub Bogusz wrote: Could rust be installed on carme-x32? I'd like to (try to) fix mozjs102 build (required for new gjs), but I cannot install rust myself because of x86_64 packages requirements. Should be available now. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl |

Re: x32 builder has network access

2023-01-18 Thread Jan Palus
On 18.01.2023 16:48, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:02:34PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via > pld-devel-en wrote: > > On 18.01.2023 09:56, Jan Palus wrote: > > >On 18.01.2023 07:54, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > > >>On 17.01.2023 12:23, Jan Palus wrote: > >

Re: x32 builder has network access

2023-01-18 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:02:34PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > On 18.01.2023 09:56, Jan Palus wrote: > >On 18.01.2023 07:54, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > >>On 17.01.2023 12:23, Jan Palus wrote: > >>>Noticed during build of

rust on carme-x32

2023-01-18 Thread Jakub Bogusz
Could rust be installed on carme-x32? I'd like to (try to) fix mozjs102 build (required for new gjs), but I cannot install rust myself because of x86_64 packages requirements. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list

Re: x32 builder has network access

2023-01-18 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 18.01.2023 09:56, Jan Palus wrote: On 18.01.2023 07:54, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: On 17.01.2023 12:23, Jan Palus wrote: Noticed during build of kodi-addon-inputstream-adaptive that contrary to x86_64 and i686, x32 builder downloaded external sources successfully: bind

Re: x32 builder has network access

2023-01-18 Thread Jan Palus
On 18.01.2023 07:54, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > On 17.01.2023 12:23, Jan Palus wrote: > > Noticed during build of kodi-addon-inputstream-adaptive that contrary to > > x86_64 and i686, x32 builder downloaded external sources successfully: > > bind was installed there and seems

Re: x32 builder has network access

2023-01-17 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 17.01.2023 12:23, Jan Palus wrote: Noticed during build of kodi-addon-inputstream-adaptive that contrary to x86_64 and i686, x32 builder downloaded external sources successfully: bind was installed there and seems that even if there is no access to /etc/resolv.conf glibc fallbacks to

x32 builder has network access

2023-01-17 Thread Jan Palus
Noticed during build of kodi-addon-inputstream-adaptive that contrary to x86_64 and i686, x32 builder downloaded external sources successfully: [ 2%] Performing download step (download, verify and extract) for 'bento4' cd /tmp/B.77a99ah0/BUILD/inputstream.adaptive-20.3.2-Nexus/build/bento4/src &&

PLD Th 2022 snapshot released

2023-01-04 Thread Jan Rękorajski
2022 snapshot of PLD/Linux Th has been released. It is available on ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/th/2022/PLD/ and as poldek sources th-2022. The main highlights of this release are: kernels 6.1.1, 5.15.85, 5.10.161, 5.4.228, 4.19.269, 4.14.302, 4.9.336 and 4.4.302 (4.4 and 4.9 have

Re: udev-core R >= 4.15

2022-12-22 Thread Jan Palus
On 22.12.2022 11:49, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > udev-core change: > > -Requires: uname(release) >= 3.13 > +Requires: uname(release) >= 4.15 > > > Is this true requirement? This R: was updated purely based on very first entry in release notes for 251:

udev-core R >= 4.15

2022-12-22 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
udev-core change: -Requires: uname(release) >= 3.13 +Requires: uname(release) >= 4.15 Is this true requirement? I mean docs say: " README: say kernel 4.15 is the minimum recommended After various long discussions

Re: DISTFILES: qt6: ERRORS: qt-everywhere-src-6.3.2.tar.xz

2022-10-31 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 30.10.2022 18:08, Jan Palus wrote: On 24.10.2022 09:17, Jan Palus wrote: On 24.10.2022 09:13, atler wrote: Request by: atler wget -nv --no-iri --user-agent=PLD/distfiles -O ./tmp/c988e5de-3fbe-4f8d-9c0e-892a6cc71ea2/bc928a9897698ec397b11c3dbff40e53/qt-everywhere-src-6.3.2.tar.xz

Re: DISTFILES: qt6: ERRORS: qt-everywhere-src-6.3.2.tar.xz

2022-10-30 Thread Jan Palus
On 24.10.2022 09:17, Jan Palus wrote: > On 24.10.2022 09:13, atler wrote: > > Request by: atler > > > > wget -nv --no-iri --user-agent=PLD/distfiles -O > > ./tmp/c988e5de-3fbe-4f8d-9c0e-892a6cc71ea2/bc928a9897698ec397b11c3dbff40e53/qt-everywhere-src-6.3.2.tar.xz > > > >

push failure

2022-10-27 Thread Jan Palus
first try pushing to mozilla-firefox-bin failed with: error: remote unpack failed: unable to create temporary object directory To ssh://git.pld-linux.org/packages/mozilla-firefox-bin ! [remote rejected] master -> master (unpacker error) error: failed to push some refs to

Re: DISTFILES: qt6: ERRORS: qt-everywhere-src-6.3.2.tar.xz

2022-10-24 Thread Jan Palus
On 24.10.2022 09:13, atler wrote: > Request by: atler > > wget -nv --no-iri --user-agent=PLD/distfiles -O > ./tmp/c988e5de-3fbe-4f8d-9c0e-892a6cc71ea2/bc928a9897698ec397b11c3dbff40e53/qt-everywhere-src-6.3.2.tar.xz > >

Re: pfa-signpkg resets tty echo after failed password input:

2022-10-20 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
> On 20. Oct 2022, at 15:37, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > pldth@ep09-pld SRPMS/.metadata$ pfa-signpkg test *pecl* > Checking signatures of 164 files from 17 packages > 164/164 > /home/pld/admins/th/ftp/test/x86_64/debuginfo/php82-pecl-xmlrpc-debugsource-1.0.0-1.RC3.1.x86_64.rpm > Total 164

pfa-signpkg resets tty echo after failed password input:

2022-10-20 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
pldth@ep09-pld SRPMS/.metadata$ pfa-signpkg test *pecl* Checking signatures of 164 files from 17 packages 164/164 /home/pld/admins/th/ftp/test/x86_64/debuginfo/php82-pecl-xmlrpc-debugsource-1.0.0-1.RC3.1.x86_64.rpm Total 164 files to sign Enter signing password: Signing 164 files

Re: [packages/python3-git-filter-repo] - new, separated from git-filter-repo.spec (now with python metadata, required for e.g. b4)

2022-10-17 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:14:27PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > wth. how is this any good? > > just add the -n python3-git-filter-repo to main git-filter-repo package! > > with your package split and the require-line in old spec, you force us > to keep two .spec files up todate with each

Re: [packages/python3-git-filter-repo] - new, separated from git-filter-repo.spec (now with python metadata, required for e.g. b4)

2022-10-17 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
wth. how is this any good? just add the -n python3-git-filter-repo to main git-filter-repo package! with your package split and the require-line in old spec, you force us to keep two .spec files up todate with each release of git-filter-repo, additionally deal with sending to builders, and in

Re: freshness report not fresh

2022-09-27 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > For some time now freshness report at > http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness does not seem to be > updated. Can someone have a look? Fixed. Leftover lock in SPECS repo :/ -- Jan Rękorajski| PLD/Linux SysAdm |

freshness report not fresh

2022-09-24 Thread Jan Palus
For some time now freshness report at http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness does not seem to be updated. Can someone have a look? ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org

Re: %_usrlibrpm macro gone

2022-09-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:08 PM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > rpm-4.17.1.1-1.x86_64 > > dokuwiki* packages don’t build due that: > > ``` > > + %{_usrlibrpm}/dokuwiki-find-lang.sh > /home/users/glen/tmp/dokuwiki-20180422c-x86_64-root-glen dokuwiki.lang > /home/users/glen/tmp/rpm-tmp.oRtxaL[82]:

%_usrlibrpm macro gone

2022-09-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
rpm-4.17.1.1-1.x86_64 dokuwiki* packages don’t build due that: ``` + %{_usrlibrpm}/dokuwiki-find-lang.sh /home/users/glen/tmp/dokuwiki-20180422c-x86_64-root-glen dokuwiki.lang /home/users/glen/tmp/rpm-tmp.oRtxaL[82]: %{_usrlibrpm}/dokuwiki-find-lang.sh: inaccessible or not found ``` What’s

Re: KDE - all form test

2022-09-14 Thread Jan Palus
On 14.09.2022 10:29, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: >On 14.09.2022 01:40, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > > Dnia 2022-09-13, o godz. 16:15:06 > Andrzej Zawadzki [1] napisal/(a): > > >Qt 5.15.6 - similar problem. For example kwallet doesn't work with >NetworkManager. > >

Re: KDE - all form test

2022-09-14 Thread Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en
Dnia 2022-09-14, o godz. 10:29:58 Andrzej Zawadzki napisał(a): > Works now. > > But... should KDE be strictly dependent on the Qt version? > > Second time when Qt update broke my KDE environment. As a non-programmer, I'm guessing that KDE expects that all its components will be build with the

Re: KDE - all form test

2022-09-14 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
On 14.09.2022 01:40, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: Dnia 2022-09-13, o godz. 16:15:06 Andrzej Zawadzki [1] napisal/(a): Qt 5.15.6 - similar problem. For example kwallet doesn't work with NetworkManager. Downgrade help, so looks like after Qt upgrade rebuild off all

Re: KDE - all form test

2022-09-13 Thread Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en
Dnia 2022-09-13, o godz. 16:15:06 Andrzej Zawadzki napisał(a): >Qt 5.15.6 - similar problem. For example kwallet doesn't work with >NetworkManager. > >Downgrade help, so looks like after Qt upgrade rebuild off all kde5 >packages will help. I sent all ka5 and kp5 packages to

Re: KDE - all form test

2022-09-13 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
On 1.07.2022 19:22, Peri Noid wrote: Dnia piatek, 1 lipca 2022 14:31:04 CEST Andrzej Zawadzki pisze: OK Qt5 was to fresh. I found in logs: *plasmashell[2012]: Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (5.15.4) with this library (5.15.5)* Hmm, rebuild is needed? I did a full downgrade of Qt5 to

Re: [packages/rpm-build-tools] builder: don't bother going back to original $(pwd) at the end of script

2022-08-31 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
> On 31. Aug 2022, at 13:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:41 AM Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en > wrote: >> >> On 31.08.2022 11:27, Jan Rękorajski wrote: >>> Where will it land now? If you want to protect against landing in >>> non-existing directory you can use

Re: [packages/rpm-build-tools] builder: don't bother going back to original $(pwd) at the end of script

2022-08-31 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:41 AM Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > > On 31.08.2022 11:27, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > Where will it land now? If you want to protect against landing in > > non-existing directory you can use '[ -d "$__PWD" ] && cd "$__PWD"' > > I really prefer to be

Re: [packages/rpm-build-tools] builder: don't bother going back to original $(pwd) at the end of script

2022-08-31 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
On 31.08.2022 11:27, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Where will it land now? If you want to protect against landing in non-existing directory you can use '[ -d "$__PWD" ] && cd "$__PWD"' I really prefer to be staying in the same directory where I launched the script in. Do you include (via source/dot)

Re: [packages/rpm-build-tools] builder: don't bother going back to original $(pwd) at the end of script

2022-08-31 Thread Jan Palus
On 31.08.2022 11:27, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > Where will it land now? If you want to protect against landing in > non-existing directory you can use '[ -d "$__PWD" ] && cd "$__PWD"' > I really prefer to be staying in the same directory where I launched > the script in. I considered doing `test -d`

Re: [packages/rpm-build-tools] builder: don't bother going back to original $(pwd) at the end of script

2022-08-31 Thread Jan Rękorajski
Where will it land now? If you want to protect against landing in non-existing directory you can use '[ -d "$__PWD" ] && cd "$__PWD"' I really prefer to be staying in the same directory where I launched the script in. On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:59 AM atler wrote: > > commit

Re: glibc 2.36 *.o files debug extraction broken

2022-08-16 Thread Jan Palus
On 16.08.2022 21:53, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:28:58PM +0200, Jan Palus wrote: > > On 16.08.2022 20:31, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > > In glibc 2.36 build debuginfo extraction process removes .note.GNU-stack > > > section: > > > > ... > > > > > For now only i686 builds are

Re: glibc 2.36 *.o files debug extraction broken

2022-08-16 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:28:58PM +0200, Jan Palus wrote: > On 16.08.2022 20:31, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > In glibc 2.36 build debuginfo extraction process removes .note.GNU-stack > > section: > > ... > > > For now only i686 builds are affected because x86_64 and x32 glibc-devel > > packages > >

Re: glibc 2.36 *.o files debug extraction broken

2022-08-16 Thread Jan Palus
On 16.08.2022 20:31, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > In glibc 2.36 build debuginfo extraction process removes .note.GNU-stack > section: ... > For now only i686 builds are affected because x86_64 and x32 glibc-devel > packages > haven't been updated on builders. > > > Any guesses what changed? I

glibc 2.36 *.o files debug extraction broken

2022-08-16 Thread Jakub Bogusz
In glibc 2.36 build debuginfo extraction process removes .note.GNU-stack section: (before installing) $ objdump -h ../BUILD/glibc-2.36.debuginfo/builddir/csu/crtn.o ../BUILD/glibc-2.36.debuginfo/builddir/csu/crtn.o: file format elf32-i386 Sections: Idx Name Size VMA LMA

Re: Qt packaging

2022-08-08 Thread Jan Palus
On 08.08.2022 23:34, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > On Mon, 08 Aug 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > > > On 08.08.2022 08:32, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > > > > > > > On 22.07.2022 11:03, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > > > Can someone explain why are we using split

Re: Qt packaging

2022-08-08 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Mon, 08 Aug 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > On 08.08.2022 08:32, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > > > > > On 22.07.2022 11:03, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > > Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? > > > > > > > > I want to add Qt6 and

Re: Qt packaging

2022-08-08 Thread Jan Palus
On 08.08.2022 08:32, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > > > On 22.07.2022 11:03, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? > > > > > > I want to add Qt6 and building from the monolythic source is s much > > >

Re: Qt packaging

2022-08-08 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Mon, 08 Aug 2022, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 2:32 AM Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > > > > > On 22.07.2022 11:03, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > > Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? > > > > > > > > I want to

Re: Qt packaging

2022-08-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 2:32 AM Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > > > On 22.07.2022 11:03, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? > > > > > > I want to add Qt6 and building from the monolythic source is s

Re: Qt packaging

2022-08-08 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > On 22.07.2022 11:03, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? > > > > I want to add Qt6 and building from the monolythic source is s much > > easier. No need for bootstrap, no intertwined build

Unable to install some old? packages

2022-07-28 Thread Jan Palus
# rpm --initdb --root=/pld # rpm --import --root=/pld PLD-3.0-Th-GPG-key.asc # poldek --root=/pld -uv filesystem ... Processing dependencies... filesystem-4.1-15.x86_64 marks FHS-3.0-7.x86_64 (cap FHS >= 3.0) There are 2 packages to install (1 marked by dependencies): A FHS-3.0-7.x86_64

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >