Re: glibc compilation problem
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Hello, I have encountered a big problem with glibc compilation on PLD-Th-derived system: [...] Problem solved. It was '-feliminate-dwarf2-dups' still used in CFLAGS by my RPM. Greets, Jacek ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
glibc compilation problem
Hello,
I have encountered a big problem with glibc compilation on
PLD-Th-derived system:
glibc 2.4 build (from glibc.spec rev. 1.648) fails with:
i686-pld-linux-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/librtld.map.o '-Wl,-('
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a -lgcc '-Wl,-)'
-Wl,-Map,/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/librtld.mapT
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a(chk_fail.os):
In function `*__GI___chk_fail':
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/debug/chk_fail.c:28: multiple
definition of `__GI___chk_fail'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/elf/dl-minimal.c:354:
first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `__GI___chk_fail' changed from 27 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os to 64 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a(chk_fail.os)
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a(chk_fail.os):
In function `*__GI___chk_fail':
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/debug/chk_fail.c:28: multiple
definition of `__chk_fail'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/elf/dl-minimal.c:354:
first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `__chk_fail' changed from 27 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os to 64 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a(chk_fail.os)
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a(init-first.os):(.data+0x0):
multiple definition of `__libc_multiple_libcs'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/elf/rtld.c:825:
first defined here
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a(_itoa.os): In
function `_itoa':
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/stdio-common/_itoa.c:210: multiple
definition of `_itoa'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/elf/dl-minimal.c:295:
first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `_itoa' changed from 192 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os to 612
in /home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a(_itoa.os)
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a(sbrk.os): In
function `*__GI___sbrk':
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/misc/sbrk.c:34: multiple definition
of `__sbrk'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/elf/../misc/sbrk.c:34:
first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `__sbrk' changed from 113 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os to 108
in /home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a(sbrk.os)
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/libc_pic.a: could not read
symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: ***
[/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/librtld.map] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/elf'
make[1]: *** [elf/subdir_lib] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73973 (%build)
binutils-2.17.50.0.6-1.aos1.i686
gcc-4.2.0-0.20060916r116994.3.aos2.i686
(.aos* releases don't differ much from PLD Th specs -- only release change in
these cases).
Any ideas what may be wrong? Where to look for solution?
I managed to build with glibc when bootstraping my build environment (I used
older binutils/gcc versions then (about month ago), probably from PLD Th), but
I need to rebuild it now.
Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable?
Greets,
Jacek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: glibc compilation problem
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable?
I have tried. The same problem:
: /home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a
i686-pld-linux-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/librtld.map.o '-Wl,-('
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a -lgcc '-Wl,-)'
-Wl,-Map,/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/librtld.mapT
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a(chk_fail.os):
In function `*__GI___chk_fail':
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/debug/chk_fail.c:28: multiple
definition of `__GI___chk_fail'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/elf/dl-minimal.c:354:
first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `__GI___chk_fail' changed from 27 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os to 64 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a(chk_fail.os)
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a(chk_fail.os):
In function `*__GI___chk_fail':
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/debug/chk_fail.c:28: multiple
definition of `__chk_fail'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/elf/dl-minimal.c:354:
first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `__chk_fail' changed from 27 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os to 64 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a(chk_fail.os)
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a(init-first.os):(.data+0x0):
multiple definition of `__libc_multiple_libcs'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/elf/rtld.c:827:
first defined here
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a(_itoa.os): In
function `_itoa':
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/stdio-common/_itoa.c:210: multiple
definition of `_itoa'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/elf/dl-minimal.c:295:
first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `_itoa' changed from 192 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os to 612
in /home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a(_itoa.os)
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a(sbrk.os): In
function `*__GI___sbrk':
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/misc/sbrk.c:34: multiple definition
of `__sbrk'
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os:/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/elf/../misc/sbrk.c:34:
first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `__sbrk' changed from 113 in
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/dl-allobjs.os to 108
in /home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a(sbrk.os)
/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a: could not read
symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: ***
[/home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/elf/librtld.map] Error 1
Greets,
Jacek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: glibc compilation problem
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable? I have tried. The same problem: Maybe too new gcc? glibc 2.5 builds for me with binutils-2.17.50.0.6-1.athlon and gcc-4.1.0-1.athlon. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: glibc compilation problem
On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable? I have tried. The same problem: Maybe too new gcc? glibc 2.5 builds for me with binutils-2.17.50.0.6-1.athlon and gcc-4.1.0-1.athlon. works for me for gcc-4.2.0-0.20061030r118195.3. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: glibc compilation problem
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable? I have tried. The same problem: Maybe too new gcc? glibc 2.5 builds for me with binutils-2.17.50.0.6-1.athlon and gcc-4.1.0-1.athlon. works for me for gcc-4.2.0-0.20061030r118195.3. Which architectures? -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: glibc compilation problem
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:10:01PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable?
I have tried. The same problem:
Maybe too new gcc?
glibc 2.5 builds for me with binutils-2.17.50.0.6-1.athlon and
gcc-4.1.0-1.athlon.
works for me for gcc-4.2.0-0.20061030r118195.3.
Which architectures?
x86_64 probably
works for me, on ppc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q glibc gcc binutils
glibc-2.5-0.2
gcc-4.1.2-0.20060928r117266.2
binutils-2.17.50.0.2-2
--
Sparky{PI] -- Przemyslaw _ ___ _ _ ... LANG...Pl..Ca..Es..En
/) ___ ___ _ _ || Iskra | | _ \| | | : WWWppcrcd.pld-linux.org
\\| -_)'___| ||^'||//\\//| _/| | | : JID..sparkyatjabberes.org
(/|| (_-_|_|| ||\\ || |_ |_| |_| _| : Mailsparkyatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: glibc compilation problem
On Monday 06 November 2006 22:10, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable? I have tried. The same problem: Maybe too new gcc? glibc 2.5 builds for me with binutils-2.17.50.0.6-1.athlon and gcc-4.1.0-1.athlon. works for me for gcc-4.2.0-0.20061030r118195.3. Which architectures? th-x86_64. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: glibc compilation problem
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable? I have tried. The same problem: Maybe too new gcc? glibc 2.5 builds for me with binutils-2.17.50.0.6-1.athlon and gcc-4.1.0-1.athlon. works for me for gcc-4.2.0-0.20061030r118195.3. And for me not. :-( The same problem. Probably I have something broken in my build environment, but I have no idea where to look... Architecture is i686 and i586. Greets, Jacek ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
