Hi Alan,
I'll have a look into this topic. Ideally we should provide two
packages, one with Visual Studio C++ 6.0 libraries and one with MinGW
libraries. Python and so on, can use both or at least one of these
packages. I'm not aware of projects which would depend on Borland
libraries and so
Alan W. Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2006-12-15 09:56+0100 Werner Smekal wrote:
There are two issues here (and a third one below):
(1) Working out the current bugs in the package target. I suggest you first
do that with your MinGW platform since that is obviously an important
Andrew,
I was just about to write a patch for freeing plbuf_buffer and I saw
that you had beaten me to the punch. The question that I have is
whether plP_tidy is the best place. I note that plP_tidy is called by
c_plend1() and plGetFam(). The plGetFam() function gets called by the
driver bop
