Hello,
Due a number of significant changes it has been requested that the 5.9.2
release of PLplot should happen in a few weeks time. Tentatively I'm
going suggest the weekend of January 17-18th. Is this acceptable?
best,
-Hazen
On 2008-12-23 21:04-0500 Hazen Babcock wrote:
I've updated the website to reflect version 5.9.1. Hopefully everything
is present and correct.
I have rsynced the new website files back to my home box and compared the
file names with the file names of a local PLplot website I generated a while
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
* The Ada example source files are filled with a not yet available string.
(To see this click on the Ada button at
http://plplot.sourceforge.net/examples.php?demo=01.)
My guess is you haven't yet installed the gnat package (which contains the
Ada compiler) on your new
On 2008-12-24 11:57-0500 Hazen Babcock wrote:
Hello,
Due a number of significant changes it has been requested that the 5.9.2
release of PLplot should happen in a few weeks time. Tentatively I'm
going suggest the weekend of January 17-18th. Is this acceptable?
That would be great!
There
On 2008-12-23 10:18-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
But if you
feel my suggested bump of the minimum version to 2.6.0 is so early that a
majority of PLplot builders be forced into building CMake-2.6.x for
themselves, then I would be willing to wait a couple more months to make
this change.
Since
On 2008-12-24 12:39-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
I will deal with the python issues outside example 19. The python example 21
missing issue is because I am testing with Numeric (HAVE_NUMPY=OFF) rather
than numpy. I don't think the Numeric interface to PLplot change that would
be required to fix
