On 2008-12-24 12:39-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> I will deal with the python issues outside example 19. The python example 21
> missing issue is because I am testing with Numeric (HAVE_NUMPY=OFF) rather
> than numpy. I don't think the Numeric interface to PLplot change that would
> be required to f
On 2008-12-23 10:18-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> But if you
> feel my suggested bump of the minimum version to 2.6.0 is so early that a
> majority of PLplot builders be forced into building CMake-2.6.x for
> themselves, then I would be willing to wait a couple more months to make
> this change.
Si
On 2008-12-24 11:57-0500 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Due a number of significant changes it has been requested that the 5.9.2
> release of PLplot should happen in a few weeks time. Tentatively I'm
> going suggest the weekend of January 17-18th. Is this acceptable?
That would be great!
Th
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> * The Ada example source files are filled with a "not yet available" string.
> (To see this click on the Ada button at
> http://plplot.sourceforge.net/examples.php?demo=01.)
>
> My guess is you haven't yet installed the gnat package (which contains the
> Ada compiler) on
On 2008-12-23 21:04-0500 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
> I've updated the website to reflect version 5.9.1. Hopefully everything
> is present and correct.
I have rsynced the new website files back to my home box and compared the
file names with the file names of a local PLplot website I generated a whil
Hazen,
I'm in agreement with that. Not just significant changes, but a fair
number of bug fixes as well.
Andrew
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:57:54AM -0500, Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Due a number of significant changes it has been requested that the 5.9.2
> release of PLplot should ha
Hello,
Due a number of significant changes it has been requested that the 5.9.2
release of PLplot should happen in a few weeks time. Tentatively I'm
going suggest the weekend of January 17-18th. Is this acceptable?
best,
-Hazen
