Re: [Plplot-devel] python extension linking, was RE: python branch now "merged"

2009-07-01 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-07-01 17:38-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote: > Alan W. Irwin writes: > > To avoid that question mark, I suggest the following compromise. > > > > Put in a cmake option (EXCLUDE_PYTHON_LIBRARIES) which you can set for > > your needs, and which everyone else can ignore. We can then remove that

Re: [Plplot-devel] plplot_pyqt4 status

2009-07-01 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-07-01 08:58+0100 Alban Rochel wrote: > Hello all, > > Actually, this is one of the few days I am in contact, so: > - I must have misunderstood something about dynamic casts because I > believed that QtPLDriver* widget=(QtPLDriver*)(pls->dev) would have > created a "pure" QtPLDriver* object

Re: [Plplot-devel] python extension linking, was RE: python branch now "merged"

2009-07-01 Thread Geoffrey Furnish
Alan W. Irwin writes: > On 2009-07-01 00:09-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote: > > HOWEVER: PLplot's Python binding needs numpy. And here comes the rub. > > It turns out that Numpy's installation will *not work* if the python was > > built --enable-shared. If you don't build --enable-shared, then y

Re: [Plplot-devel] python extension linking, was RE: python branch now "merged"

2009-07-01 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-07-01 00:09-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote: > [...]Now, what I find is that if I configure Python (today I tested 2.6.2, > but I > believe from prior experience that 2.5.x is the same in these regards) by > just saying: > > cd Python-2.6.2 > configure --prefix=$PREFIX > make >

Re: [Plplot-devel] python branch now "merged"

2009-07-01 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-06-30 23:29-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote: > Alan W. Irwin writes: > > [...]I would like to take > > this opportunity to claim back the x??.py namespace with the modern debugged > > examples if you can figure out a way to use those examples from pytkdemo so > > we can ditch the old ones. >

Re: [Plplot-devel] plplot_pyqt4 status

2009-07-01 Thread Alban Rochel
Alan W. Irwin wrote: > On 2009-07-01 02:17+0300 Dmitri Gribenko wrote: > > Thanks Terrence and Dmitri for your ideas about how to solve this issue. > > I believe Alban will not be able to comment in a timely manner because he is > probably out of e-mail contact right now. Given that situation, I