On 2009-08-05 23:04, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Hazen Babcock wrote:
>> I like this idea/approach. Is there a reason not to reduce it even further?
>>
>> plget(const char *, void *)
>> plset(const char *, void *)
>>
>> It seems that either way the user would have to
On 2009-08-05 11:25-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> Commit 10215 fixes the problem [segfault for example 19] on my system, with a
> slight change to
> the custom label callback signature. It now takes a string length
> argument, and the callback is expected to set the label text directly.
> Exam
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Hazen Babcock wrote:
> Davide Cesari wrote:
>>> I'm inclined to add at least a function to get the current pen width and
>>> the current plcol0 index.
>>>
>>> Any objections to this expansion of the API? Any objections to adding
>>> getters in the future for all othe
Davide Cesari wrote:
>> I'm inclined to add at least a function to get the current pen width and
>> the current plcol0 index.
>>
>> Any objections to this expansion of the API? Any objections to adding
>> getters in the future for all other PLplot setters? How about the
>> save/unsave feature as
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-08-04 08:48-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> On 2009-08-03 22:21-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>>
>>> Commit 10206 adds custom axis label support (the function
>>> plslabelfunc, C only for now) to PLplot trunk. Commit 10207 updates
>>>
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-07-31 11:49+0100 Alban Rochel wrote:
>
> I have recently been doing some interactive testing, and I have to comment
> on the outstanding speed obtained with the new version of qtwidget. Here are
> some timing comparisons for example 8, but other examples also show
