On 2010-10-01 19:12-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>> Assuming that short time scale is possible for the next release, what
>> do the other developers here think about this possibility? Would you
>> be against it (because you have a lot you want to develop and waiting
>> through a stable release cycle
On Oct 1, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Hazen Babcock wrote:
> Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> On 2010-09-24 12:45-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>>
>>> Alan W. Irwin wrote:
[...]Is the 5.9.7 development release still on for next
weekend?
>>>
>>> Yep, assuming that there are no objections.
>>
>> Hi Hazen:
>>
>>
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-09-24 12:45-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
>> Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>> [...]Is the 5.9.7 development release still on for next
>>> weekend?
>>
>> Yep, assuming that there are no objections.
>
> Hi Hazen:
>
> For those who might be doing some last-minute documentation
To Hez and Andrew:
I have just assigned the "const" qualifier to all array arguments of
pllegend. I think this is the right thing to do, and it seems to work
fine, but neither of you mentioned this possibility when reviewing the
pllegend API, and I am inexperienced with the "const" nuances.
Furth
On 2010-09-24 12:45-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
> Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> [...]Is the 5.9.7 development release still on for next
>> weekend?
>
> Yep, assuming that there are no objections.
Hi Hazen:
For those who might be doing some last-minute documentation (probably
not me since I hope to finis
