On 2012-01-27 14:59-0500 Chris Marshall wrote:
> Is there some reason that split cannot be used
> for Octave releases and strsplit for more recent
> ones rather than abandoning support for older
> Octaves?
Hi Chris:
I think split is the way we should go since it doesn't compromise our
current Oc
On 2012-01-27 09:56+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
> The concise story is: these intrinsics do work from within
> a DLL or a shared object with both gfortran and Intel
> Fortran and apparently with other compilers as well.
>
> So I suggest we put an adjusted configurable.f90 into the
> library - there i
On 2012-01-25 11:36- Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:06:06AM +0100, Arjen Markus wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 2012-01-25 10:57, Andrew Ross wrote:
>>
>>> If the string contained characters, then just the characters were passed
>>> (with trailing spaces removed). If a null stri
On 2012-01-26 22:23- Andrew Ross wrote:
> Aside from the fortran issues I've commented on elsewhere, the only
> other issue I noted is that we have not propagated Alan's new
> example 0 yet. If we decide not to do that, then we should probably
> remove it from the test_diff_psc target.
Hi And
> One issue I did note is that the alignment between the cross from
> plpoin and plstring is slightly different. (I noticed this by accidently
> leaving the plpoin call in as well as the plstring one).
>
> I haven't investigated further yet to know which one is "right" but
> it would be worth a loo
Is there some reason that split cannot be used
for Octave releases and strsplit for more recent
ones rather than abandoning support for older
Octaves?
--Chris
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/16/2012 06:25 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> On 2012-01-16 14:46-0700 Orion
On 01/16/2012 06:25 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2012-01-16 14:46-0700 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> - split has now be removed from octave in favor of strsplit:
>>
>> 6: error: `split' undefined near line 3 column 5
>>
>> I believe this has been raised before but was decided to stay with split at
>
Hi Alan,
I have to correct this message:
As you can see it contains some rubbish left over from
examining a problem I had with Intel Fortran. The program
as I mailed it does not use the two intrinsics (I got an
error message about the initialisation of the runtime
library and wanted to make sure i
