On 2014-02-06 10:10-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> So just skip running the build_cmake target on MinGW/MSYS.
In fact, if you svn update to revision 12982, then a build of the
cmake software on MinGW/MSYS should no longer be available as an
option so that you are forced to do the right thing on that
On 2014-02-06 01:43-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> [...] I
> have successfully completed some critical bits and pieces of the same
> comprehensivive plplot_lite tests on MinGW/MSYS/Wine that were failing
> for the last release. That leads me to believe a repeat on that
> platform of the comprehensiv
On 2014-02-06 01:43-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On top of that epa_build regression check for the Linux platform, I
> have successfully completed some critical bits and pieces of the same
> comprehensivive plplot_lite tests on MinGW/MSYS/Wine that were failing
> for the last release. That leads m
On 2014-02-06 12:08- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Arjen Markus [mailto:arjen.mar...@deltares.nl]
>>
>> Next step: see if I can build CMake from source.
>>
>
> That presented no problem. So the procedure in epa_build is overlooking
> something. Perhap
Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Arjen Markus [mailto:arjen.mar...@deltares.nl]
>
> Next step: see if I can build CMake from source.
>
That presented no problem. So the procedure in epa_build is overlooking
something. Perhaps epa_build should simply use
the bootstrap script? That wo
On 2/4/2014 5:05 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> So Hazen, assuming no other core PLplot developer have questions about
> the conversion of the official PLplot repo to git would you be willing
> to do that conversion (at SourceForge, see below) after I have
> finished my timeephem git evaluation, i.e.
On 2014-02-06 10:41- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> after some initial hiccups (involving two independent but not quite detached
> installations of
> MinGW/MSYS) the build is progressing. At least, I think it is. The task
> manager indicates
> make.exe is using a lot of processor time, b
Hi Alan,
after some initial hiccups (involving two independent but not quite detached
installations of
MinGW/MSYS) the build is progressing. At least, I think it is. The task manager
indicates
make.exe is using a lot of processor time, but no files seem to be produced.
Also no indication
of the
Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>
> @Arjen: This would be a good time for you to attempt to adapt the directions
> in the
> above README file for the MinGW/MSYS/Wine case in order to replicate my
> current
> test on your MinGW/MSYS
To everyone here:
The actual date of the release is still uncertain because I am not
completely done with my planned comprehensive MinGW/MSYS testing yet.
However, I have been having good luck with comprehensive testing on
Linux, so now (revision 12980) would be a good time to repeat the
tests (cu
10 matches
Mail list logo
