The lack of testing is a bit of a concern. There are also several
outstanding issues which we want to address so I suggest the
next release might not be too long in the pipeline.
Andrew
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:40:05PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
Hi Jerry:
I am moving this discussion to
Doug, there is a fairly urgent question for you below. There is also a less
urgent question for Werner.
I have just started another round of testing this weekend in anticipation of
the release next weekend, and here is the current status of the results from
the test_diff_psc target (which is run
Just to update on Alan's email last week. I've now fixed up f77, f95,
java and python. Tcl is also in order.
The fortran changes also involved tidying up plmap / plmeridian.
Example 19 use an identify transform since fortran does not support
NULL functions. This does not work as the generalised
Hello,
On 2010-05-12 19:53, Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
Alan W. Irwin writes:
This example require Tcl 8.5 or later: use of NaNs
I've taken a look into Tcl example 21, and I'm not very convinced. What I
find is that when I comment out the return which currently bails if you don't
have
Alan W. Irwin writes:
On 2010-05-11 12:29-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
Geoffrey Furnish writes:
Alan W. Irwin writes:
C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
non-perfect bindings:
tcl
Missing examples:
C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
non-perfect bindings:
f77
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output : 19
Missing stdout :
Differing stdout:
f95
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output
Alan W. Irwin writes:
C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
non-perfect bindings:
tcl
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output : 19 21 28
Missing stdout :
Differing stdout: 21
I believe I've
On 2010-05-11 11:43-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
Hi Alan,
Alan W. Irwin writes:
C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
non-perfect bindings:
[...]
tcl
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output : 19 21 28
Missing stdout
On 2010-05-11 12:29-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
Geoffrey Furnish writes:
Alan W. Irwin writes:
C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
non-perfect bindings:
tcl
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output : 19 21 28
Alan W. Irwin writes:
Since your question is of general interest to developers, I am posting my
reply to the list.
I'm working on Tcl #19. I'm close to getting it straightened out, hope to
commit soon.
Question: In my own comparisons between the C and Tcl examples,
generated
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
Alan W. Irwin writes:
Since your question is of general interest to developers, I am posting my
reply to the list.
I'm working on Tcl #19. I'm close to getting it straightened out, hope
to
commit soon.
On 2010-05-11 23:53+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
Alan's idea of using cmp may be more efficient on
Linux. I've not tried timing it. Not copying large files around must be
more efficient. Is cmp widely available on non-Linux platforms? I suspect
diff / tail are more common.
The main reason I used
12 matches
Mail list logo
