> Hi Arjen:
>
> Here is what I now (revision 9253) get with Tcl-8.5 on Debian testing.
>
> tcl
>Missing examples: 19
>Differing postscript output : 11 20
>Missing stdout :
>Differing stdout:
>
> That's a substantial improvement from what I got
On 2009-01-05 10:33+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
> [Andrew wrote]
>> Just for the record, your changes make no difference to me. This is on
>> Ubuntu Hardy x86 32-bit with tcl 8.4. I still have rounding differences
>> for examples 3, 11 and 20 as before. I can't test example 21 as it is
>> not enable
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 08:35:06AM +0100, Arjen Markus wrote:
>> >
>> > I would change the Tcl version to match the C logic (and the logic for
>> the
>> > other languages as well) which (as you noted) does use integers for
>> the
>> > theta-related variables for exactly the rounding reasons you
>
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 08:35:06AM +0100, Arjen Markus wrote:
> >
> > I would change the Tcl version to match the C logic (and the logic for the
> > other languages as well) which (as you noted) does use integers for the
> > theta-related variables for exactly the rounding reasons you mentioned.
>
>
> I would change the Tcl version to match the C logic (and the logic for the
> other languages as well) which (as you noted) does use integers for the
> theta-related variables for exactly the rounding reasons you mentioned.
>
Which is what I have done in my private copy. I have not had a chance
On 2008-12-31 06:22+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on the Tcl examples and found possible causes
> for the rounding errors vis-a-vis the C examples, namely
> not using braces around all expressions. (The lack of braces
> means that the numbers are filled as strings before the
> ex
Hi,
I am working on the Tcl examples and found possible causes
for the rounding errors vis-a-vis the C examples, namely
not using braces around all expressions. (The lack of braces
means that the numbers are filled as strings before the
expression is evaluated, whereas with braces the [expr]
comma
