Re: [Plplot-devel] Still on track for a February 1st release of 5.10.0

2014-01-28 Thread Arjen Markus
for a February 1st release of 5.10.0 On 2014-01-22 02:39-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > On 2014-01-21 01:44-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > >> My personal development goal for this release is to get a clean >> comprehensive test of epa_build results both on Linux and MinGW/MSYS. >

Re: [Plplot-devel] Still on track for a February 1st release of 5.10.0

2014-01-28 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2014-01-22 02:39-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > On 2014-01-21 01:44-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > >> My personal development goal for this release is to get a clean >> comprehensive test of epa_build results both on Linux and MinGW/MSYS. >> So far (aside from the known propagation issues with OCaml)

Re: [Plplot-devel] Still on track for a February 1st release of 5.10.0

2014-01-22 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2014-01-21 01:44-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > My personal development goal for this release is to get a clean > comprehensive test of epa_build results both on Linux and MinGW/MSYS. > So far (aside from the known propagation issues with OCaml) the > results of a somewhat limited version of the t

Re: [Plplot-devel] Still on track for a February 1st release of 5.10.0

2014-01-21 Thread Arjen Markus
Hi Alan, I am currently trying to reproduce the errors you documented via Cygwin, as that is the most convenient platform available to me that comes close to Linux. And while this has the benefit of unearthing the idiosyncracies of Cygwin that we need to deal with it does also slow down my prog

[Plplot-devel] Still on track for a February 1st release of 5.10.0

2014-01-21 Thread Alan W. Irwin
My personal development goal for this release is to get a clean comprehensive test of epa_build results both on Linux and MinGW/MSYS. So far (aside from the known propagation issues with OCaml) the results of a somewhat limited version of the test have looked good on PLplot. However, on MinGW/MSYS