On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:37:01AM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2009-01-19 10:12- Andrew Ross wrote:
We've said that we will drop support for octave 2.1.x from this release.
Actually, as stated in README.release we dropped support for 2.1.x in the
5.9.1 release, but I wanted to leave
We've said that we will drop support for octave 2.1.x from this release.
Are people really happy for me to go and remove the legacy code which is
in place to support this? This would make life easier and also remove
some slightly irritating warnings for octave 3.0. Octave 3.0 seems
pretty stable
On 2009-01-19 10:12- Andrew Ross wrote:
We've said that we will drop support for octave 2.1.x from this release.
Actually, as stated in README.release we dropped support for 2.1.x in the
5.9.1 release, but I wanted to leave the notice in for this release and
subsequent ones up to and
