On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-03-06 17:24-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Alan W. Irwin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What exactly did you mean by Gtk-using applications?
>>>
>>
>> Any application which uses Gtk for its GUI. Any Gnome applic
On 2010-03-06 17:24-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
I thought your idea was a winner, but unfortunately the evidence is against
that because the "direct" test got identical error messages except for the
process id, (I checked that thoroughly
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-03-06 13:41-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Alan W. Irwin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In case I am running it correctly, and therefore there is some run-time
>>> issue for my platform, here is some additional
On 2010-03-06 13:41-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Alan W. Irwin
> wrote:
>> In case I am running it correctly, and therefore there is some run-time
>> issue for my platform, here is some additional data.
>>
> ...cut (this all look fine)...
>>
>> I hope you can h
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> I have been working with xgtk_interfaceocaml in preparation for making
> this application one of the interactive tests that we run.
>
> It builds automatically and without any errors for me when BUILD_TEST=ON in
> the build tree. That good
Hi Hez:
I have been working with xgtk_interfaceocaml in preparation for making
this application one of the interactive tests that we run.
It builds automatically and without any errors for me when BUILD_TEST=ON in
the build tree. That good result continued after some CMake code cleanup
(revisio
