On Sep 20, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2007-09-20 12:50-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
>> But the arrays are defined as x[361] and thus have 362 elements.
>
> My original programming background was fortran so C array size
> declarations
> also confused me when I first encountered them.
>
>
On 2007-09-20 12:50-0700 Jerry wrote:
> But the arrays are defined as x[361] and thus have 362 elements.
My original programming background was fortran so C array size declarations
also confused me when I first encountered them.
If you check with a C tutorial or say the Kernighan and Ritchie boo
On Sep 20, 2007, at 3:56 AM, Arjen Markus wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that the arrays in x03c.c, x, y, x0, y0, are
>> incorrectly dimensioned as x[361] etc. When I make the Ada arrays
>> vary from 0 to 361, extraneous lines are plotted, but when I make
>> them go from 0 to
Jerry wrote:
>It seems to me that the arrays in x03c.c, x, y, x0, y0, are
>incorrectly dimensioned as x[361] etc. When I make the Ada arrays
>vary from 0 to 361, extraneous lines are plotted, but when I make
>them go from 0 to 360, the output looks OK. I don't know if this will
>cause the
