> On May 28, 2015, at 5:50 AM, Phil Rosenberg wrote:
>
> Hi Jim
> Sorry, when I suggested a plmalloc and plfree I meant for these to
> call free and malloc, plus do some extra bookkeeping for us to keep
> track of our garbage collection needs, not as functions to interact
> directly with the OS
Hi Jim
Sorry, when I suggested a plmalloc and plfree I meant for these to
call free and malloc, plus do some extra bookkeeping for us to keep
track of our garbage collection needs, not as functions to interact
directly with the OS to bypass free and malloc
I think the following could be a useful m
> On May 26, 2015, at 3:53 PM, Phil Rosenberg wrote:
>
> Okay, well it was an option I thought I would put out there as I think
> it was worth considering. I will try to answer the questions people
> had anyway in case people are interested.
>
> Regarding domestic bindings, the C front end w
Okay, well it was an option I thought I would put out there as I think
it was worth considering. I will try to answer the questions people
had anyway in case people are interested.
Regarding domestic bindings, the C front end would remain. Although
the API would have to change if we wanted to retu
On 2015-05-25 17:29- Arjen Markus wrote:
> An issue related to the use of C++ that has not been raised yet, but
which surfaced recently in my comprehensive testing efforts is the
fact that linking a C++ program requires a C++-enabled linker. Thus
introducing C++ as the language in which PLplot
PLplot 5 will be around for quite awhile.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hazen Babcock [mailto:hbabc...@mac.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:18 PM
> To:plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] PLPlo
<mailto:hbabc...@mac.com>]
> > Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:18 PM
> > To: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > <mailto:plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] PLPlot 6 and C++
> >
> > >
> > > On 2015-05-22
easier (and safer).
Regards,
Arjen
> -Original Message-
> From: Hazen Babcock [mailto:hbabc...@mac.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:18 PM
> To: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] PLPlot 6 and C++
>
> >
> > On 2015-05-22 1
>
> On 2015-05-22 13:00+0100 Phil Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>> I mentioned this briefly during the previous release cycle, but we all
>> had more pressing things to deal with. Dealing with errors is
>> something we really need to get a hold on for PLPlot 6 and one of the
>> big drivers for cons
On 2015-05-22 13:00+0100 Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi All
> I mentioned this briefly during the previous release cycle, but we all
> had more pressing things to deal with. Dealing with errors is
> something we really need to get a hold on for PLPlot 6 and one of the
> big drivers for considering a
10 matches
Mail list logo
