Hi Phil,
>> I will see if there compiler and linker options that
>>help
>> with the scenario you are after, but it may turn out to
>> be impossible - /MT and /MTd may be the way towards that
>> goal. (I just failed to produce a small program that
>> depends on these runtime libraries so that is e
Hi Phil,
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:59:09 +0200
"Arjen Markus" wrote:
> I will see if there compiler and linker options that
>help
> with the scenario you are after, but it may turn out to
> be impossible - /MT and /MTd may be the way towards that
> goal. (I just failed to produce a small program
Hi Phil,
right, I misunderstood the problem. There are several ways
to deal with these runtime libraries:
- Put them along with the executables on the target
machine.
If they are in the same directory this usually works,
but the manifest mechanism has made this slightly
tricky.
- Install
Hi Arjen
Sorry, the phrase "static linkage" clearly has different meanings depending
upon who uses it.
When I refer to static linkage I don't mean creating .lib files rather than
.dll files I mean linking against the static runtime libraries (/MT and /MTd
compiler options or runtime library
