On 2014-07-21 23:05-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2014-07-21 21:23+0100 António Rodrigues Tomé wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> very strange thing.
>> latter on I'll test everything
>> today i've only changed
>> bindings/qt_gui/plqt.cpp
>> the way you said and the vertical offsset was smaller so I changed the
On 2014-07-21 21:23+0100 António Rodrigues Tomé wrote:
> Hi,
> very strange thing.
> latter on I'll test everything
> today i've only changed
> bindings/qt_gui/plqt.cpp
> the way you said and the vertical offsset was smaller so I changed the
> original ofsset signal and the result was a little be
Hi,
very strange thing.
latter on I'll test everything
today i've only changed
bindings/qt_gui/plqt.cpp
the way you said and the vertical offsset was smaller so I changed the
original ofsset signal and the result was a little better. One could easily
find a new good offset for my qt built, don't
On 2014-07-21 13:16+0100 António Rodrigues Tomé wrote:
> sorry opensuse 13.1 not 13.2
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:14 PM, António Rodrigues Tomé
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>> thanks for the quick reply.
>> I'm using opensuse 13.2 x86_64 system.
>> my qt is 5.3.1 binary packages provided by the
sorry opensuse 13.1 not 13.2
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:14 PM, António Rodrigues Tomé
wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> thanks for the quick reply.
> I'm using opensuse 13.2 x86_64 system.
> my qt is 5.3.1 binary packages provided by the opensuse repository.
>
> I built the plplot with the command
>
> at
Hi Alan,
thanks for the quick reply.
I'm using opensuse 13.2 x86_64 system.
my qt is 5.3.1 binary packages provided by the opensuse repository.
I built the plplot with the command
atome@linux-9gx6:~/StatisticalForecast/bibucket/plplot/plplot-code-13137-trunk/built-dir>
cmake -DDEFAULT_NO_CAIRO_
On 2014-07-20 11:39+0100 António Rodrigues Tomé wrote:
> Hi,
> I've followed a thread in this email list about qt5 support.
> As it was dated after the official date release I've downloaded a svn
> version and built plplot with qt5 support.
>
> All the instructions on that thread discussion worked
