Re: [Plplot-devel] CMake-2.4.6 has just been released

2007-01-15 Thread Arjen Markus
Alan W. Irwin wrote: >I tried CMake-2.4.6 on my Debian stable system, and it appears to work as >well as 2.4.5. I suggest you try 2.4.6 for yourselves to make sure it is >fine on all platforms. We don't want to get caught by surprise by some >introduced platform incompatibility in 2.4.6 since tha

Re: [Plplot-devel] Typo in bindings/f95/sfstubs.h and bindings/f77/sfstubs.h

2007-01-15 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2007-01-15 08:49+0100 Arjen Markus wrote: > Well, to cut a long story short: we will use unique names - period. OK. I noticed you didn't make the commit so I did. I didn't test the change, but I think it should be okay. Alan __ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research af

Re: [Plplot-devel] Problem with octave.cmake

2007-01-15 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2007-01-11 12:21-0700 Orion Poplawski wrote: > Getting the following cmake error: > > -- PLPLOT_OCTAVE_DIR = /usr/share/plplot_octave > CMake Error: Error in cmake code at > /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/plplot-5.7.1/cmake/modules/octave.cmake:230: > Current CMake stack: > /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/plplot-

[Plplot-devel] Minor vertical alignment issue for symbols with -dev psttfc

2007-01-15 Thread Alan W. Irwin
Hi Andrew (Ross): Will you have a look at the vertical alignment of the symbols in example 1 for -dev psttf? On my two systems (Debian stable and Ubuntu Dapper) and also on Werner's MinGW windows system (where he recently got -dev psttfc to work), the symbols used to plot the line in the first tw

[Plplot-devel] 5.7.2 Release

2007-01-15 Thread hbabcockos1
Hello, A friendly reminder that I plan to release version 5.7.2 this weekend. I've made a first pass at the release notes. If you see any important changes that I missed, please let me know. Werner, could you please provide a few sentences about your new pdf driver? best, -Hazen

Re: [Plplot-devel] Typo in bindings/f95/sfstubs.h and bindings/f77/sfstubs.h

2007-01-15 Thread Arjen Markus
Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2007-01-15 08:49+0100 Arjen Markus wrote: Well, to cut a long story short: we will use unique names - period. OK. I noticed you didn't make the commit so I did. I didn't test the change, but I think it should be okay. My mistake: I thought it was already