[Plplot-devel] proposed freetype changes

2007-01-24 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi, I have a proposed change for the freetype part of plplot: for the wxwidgets driver I'm using not only one scaling factors but two (for x and y), which is nicer if you resize the windows. But since the freetype interface allows to set only one scaling factor, the font output is a mess if I

Re: [Plplot-devel] proposed freetype changes

2007-01-24 Thread Andrew Roach
Hello Werner, At 09:42 AM 24/01/2007 +0100, you wrote: >Hi, > >I have a proposed change for the freetype part of plplot: for the >wxwidgets driver I'm using not only one scaling factors but two (for x >and y), which is nicer if you resize the windows. But since the freetype >interface allows to se

Re: [Plplot-devel] proposed freetype changes

2007-01-24 Thread Werner Smekal
Hello Andrew, Andrew Roach wrote: > Hello Werner, > > > May I make a suggestion ? Keep scale, add "scalex" and "scaley", and add > logic so that if "scalex" and "scaley" are defined, they are used to scale > the plot, but if they aren't then "scale" is used ? That way the changes > will be 10

Re: [Plplot-devel] proposed freetype changes

2007-01-24 Thread Arjen Markus
Werner Smekal wrote: >Hello Andrew, > > > > >Ok, sounds good. Only problem I see is, that the value of these >variables will likely not be defined, since it's not cpp and I have no >constructor where I can set them. And than I can't find out, what was >set or not (since they may and will have

Re: [Plplot-devel] proposed freetype changes

2007-01-24 Thread Maurice LeBrun
Arjen Markus writes: > Werner Smekal wrote: > > >Hello Andrew, > > > > > > > > > >Ok, sounds good. Only problem I see is, that the value of these > >variables will likely not be defined, since it's not cpp and I have no > >constructor where I can set them. And than I can't find out,

Re: [Plplot-devel] proposed freetype changes

2007-01-24 Thread Arjen Markus
Maurice LeBrun wrote: >Arjen Markus writes: > > Werner Smekal wrote: > > > > >Hello Andrew, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Ok, sounds good. Only problem I see is, that the value of these > > >variables will likely not be defined, since it's not cpp and I have no > > >constructor where I can set