[Plplot-devel] Fortran 95 and MSVC Library Issues

2008-05-21 Thread Jim Dishaw
After a long absence on Plplot development, I decided to cleanup my patches and get them worked back into the main trunk. Some of these patches were submitted previously, however, they didn't seem to make it into the trunk. First, the fortran 95 bindings are still a bit goofed up when using Intel

Re: [Plplot-devel] Fortran 95 and MSVC Library Issues

2008-05-21 Thread Arjen Markus
Jim Dishaw wrote: >After a long absence on Plplot development, I decided to cleanup my >patches and get them worked back into the main trunk. Some of these >patches were submitted previously, however, they didn't seem to make it >into the trunk. > >First, the fortran 95 bindings are still a bit g

Re: [Plplot-devel] Fortran 95 and MSVC Library Issues

2008-05-21 Thread Jim Dishaw
Arjen Markus writes: > Jim Dishaw wrote: > >>Third, CMake does not provide an option for omitting the default >>library information when building with MSVC. This is an issue if you >>want to build a runtime independent library. A runtime independent >>library is handy because you do not have to

Re: [Plplot-devel] Fortran 95 and MSVC Library Issues

2008-05-21 Thread Jim Dishaw
Arjen Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jim Dishaw wrote: > >>Second, I have a better way of generating the plflt.inc file that avoids >>building an executable and uses the C preprocessor instead. My CMake >>edit is a crude and could be refined. Anyone care to help out? >> >> > Certainly, l