Re: [Plplot-devel] plgfci / plsfci and fortran 95

2008-08-01 Thread Andrew Ross
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:32:30PM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote: > > I've been working on implementing plgfci and plsfci in the fortran > bindings, starting with f95. Unfortunately fortran does not support > unsigned integers so PLUNICODE has to be cast to an 64 bit integer in > fortran. I've created

Re: [Plplot-devel] plgfci / plsfci and fortran 95

2008-08-01 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-08-01 08:44+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:32:30PM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote: >> >> I've been working on implementing plgfci and plsfci in the fortran >> bindings, starting with f95. Unfortunately fortran does not support >> unsigned integers so PLUNICODE has to be cas

Re: [Plplot-devel] plgfci / plsfci and fortran 95

2008-08-01 Thread Andrew Ross
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:33:05PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: > On 2008-08-01 08:44+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:32:30PM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote: > >> > >> I've been working on implementing plgfci and plsfci in the fortran > >> bindings, starting with f95. Unfortunately

Re: [Plplot-devel] plgfci / plsfci and fortran 95

2008-08-01 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-08-01 22:24+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:33:05PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: >> The result does not build for gfortran on my 64-bit Debian testing platform. >> >> Here is the x23f build error message. >> >> /home/software/plplot_cvs/HEAD/plplot_cmake/examples/f95/x23f.