Jerry,
I'm not quite sure what your latest commit is intended to do? It
certainly doesn't reproduce the C results for me.
The plplot time functions use 0.0 to represent January 1, 1970. This is
the usual unix convention for the epoch in C time functions. You have
set xmin to be 0.0 by subtracti
Hi Everybody,
I am looking into the error reported in Launchpad (Ubuntu's bug
tracking tool) in this link
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plplot/+bug/259058
It will be great if someone could comment on that bug as to whether it
is a known issue or any proposed suggestions to fix it
On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> Jerry,
>
> I'm not quite sure what your latest commit is intended to do? It
> certainly doesn't reproduce the C results for me.
>
> The plplot time functions use 0.0 to represent January 1, 1970.
> This is
> the usual unix convention for the ep
On 2008-08-18 16:04-0700 Jerry wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
>>
>> Jerry,
>>
>> I'm not quite sure what your latest commit is intended to do? It
>> certainly doesn't reproduce the C results for me.
>>
>> The plplot time functions use 0.0 to represent January 1, 1970.
>>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The HTML docs at http://plplot.sourceforge.net/docbook-manual/plplot-
> html-5.9.0/ do not contain a mention of plimage (or plimagefr which I
> think is new). However, the PDF version at http://
> plplot.sourceforge.net/docbook-man
Thanks, Hez.
Jerrhy
On Aug 18, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The HTML docs at http://plplot.sourceforge.net/docbook-manual/plplot-
>> html-5.9.0/ do not contain a mention of plimage (or plimagefr which I
>> think
On Aug 18, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2008-08-18 16:04-0700 Jerry wrote:
On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
Jerry,
I'm not quite sure what your latest commit is intended to do? It
certainly doesn't reproduce the C results for me.
The plplot time functions use
On 2008-08-18 20:17-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
> As I see it, the first thing that has to be reckoned with is why x29c.c is
> mislabeling the axis on OS X. I've pasted a screen shot as a PDF but I
> suppose it won't survive the list mail process.
No, it got attached fine, but its first label is 1970-01
On 2008-08-18 21:32-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2008-08-18 20:17-0700 Jerry wrote:
>>
>> As I see it, the first thing that has to be reckoned with is why x29c.c is
>> mislabeling the axis on OS X. I've pasted a screen shot as a PDF but I
>> suppose it won't survive the list mail process.
>
> No
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:09:42PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2008-08-18 21:32-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> > On 2008-08-18 20:17-0700 Jerry wrote:
> >>
> >> As I see it, the first thing that has to be reckoned with is why x29c.c is
> >> mislabeling the axis on OS X. I've pasted a screen shot
10 matches
Mail list logo
