> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 08:35:06AM +0100, Arjen Markus wrote:
>> >
>> > I would change the Tcl version to match the C logic (and the logic for
>> the
>> > other languages as well) which (as you noted) does use integers for
>> the
>> > theta-related variables for exactly the rounding reasons you
>
On 2009-01-05 10:33+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
> [Andrew wrote]
>> Just for the record, your changes make no difference to me. This is on
>> Ubuntu Hardy x86 32-bit with tcl 8.4. I still have rounding differences
>> for examples 3, 11 and 20 as before. I can't test example 21 as it is
>> not enable
Jerry,
Your work-around fixes things for me. I now get ada working again and
identical results to the C versions of the examples.
Thanks
Andrew
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 07:58:01PM -0700, Jerry wrote:
> Thanks, Andrew. I'll look into this. worst case is we delete the
> second argument.
> Jerry
On Jan 4, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-01-04 13:47-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
>> Yesterday I posted an announcement (the first such announcement) to
>> comp.lang.ada about the official availability of the Ada bindings to
>> PLplot. Not too surprisingly (to me), the first response was
On 2009-01-05 16:04-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> [...]Frankly, I think both sets of bindings are useful for promoting Ada
>> use of
>> PLplot. Traditional Ada programmers might prefer the thick
>> bindings, but
>> someone with experience in other langu
On Jan 5, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-01-05 16:04-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>> [...]Frankly, I think both sets of bindings are useful for
>>> promoting Ada
>>> use of
>>> PLplot. Traditional Ada programmers might prefer the
> Hi Arjen:
>
> Here is what I now (revision 9253) get with Tcl-8.5 on Debian testing.
>
> tcl
>Missing examples: 19
>Differing postscript output : 11 20
>Missing stdout :
>Differing stdout:
>
> That's a substantial improvement from what I got
