Hi Hazen,
hm, I will have to look into these issues.
Functions in Fortran are actually rather simple (*):
y = floor(x)
should work, but I may need to add some declarations (my FORTRAN 77
skills are getting a bit rusty, as Fortran 95 offers much better
tools to make the compiler agree with you).
Hi,
since floor is declared as function, you need something like
times = floor()
times = call floor() is definitely wrong; maybe, if you have declared
"implicit none", you need to declare floor as real at the beginning of
the program unit, something like:
real floor
Davide
Hazen Babc
Hi Davide, Hazen,
yes, g77 is complaining because of the "implicit none" statements.
I have now added "external floor" and "real*8 floor", so the error
messages are gone.
The second (warning) message is about calling plslabelfunc with a
literal 0, rather than a procedure name. gfortran ignores th
Hi Arjen,
Arjen Markus ha scritto:
> Hi Davide, Hazen,
>
> yes, g77 is complaining because of the "implicit none" statements.
> I have now added "external floor" and "real*8 floor", so the error
> messages are gone.
>
> The second (warning) message is about calling plslabelfunc with a
> literal
Hi Davide,
On 2009-11-12 10:22, Davide Cesari wrote:
> Hi Arjen,
>
> Arjen Markus ha scritto:
>> Hi Davide, Hazen,
>>
>> yes, g77 is complaining because of the "implicit none" statements.
>> I have now added "external floor" and "real*8 floor", so the error
>> messages are gone.
>>
>> The second
A further warning which I think results from your recent changes (this
is with gfortran 4.4.1)
[100%] Building C object bindings/f77/CMakeFiles/plplotf77cd.dir/scstubs.c.o
/home/andrew/software/plplot/plplot/bindings/f77/scstubs.c: In function
plslabelfunc_:
/home/andrew/software/plplot/plplot
Hi Alan,
Thank's for reminding me about this. To do this right is, as you say,
not trivial. I think we need to write a wrapper function which
we use in the code, and which in turn will use mkstemp or some
windows equivalent.
Note that your windows "fix" uses mktemp which is itself not
secure. A
On 2009-11-12 20:52- Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Thank's for reminding me about this. To do this right is, as you say,
> not trivial. I think we need to write a wrapper function which
> we use in the code, and which in turn will use mkstemp or some
> windows equivalent.
Agreed.
>
> N
