Hi Alan, Phil,
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
"Alan W. Irwin" wrote:
>
> I don't recall exactly what happened in this case, but
>probably I just
> silently left it to Arjen to deal with since he is in a
>good position
> to test your patch on the Windows platform.
>
> Arjen, if yo
On 30/09/2012 23:41, phil rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Alan
> I was just considering that one negative brought up regarding supporting
> shapefiles was the addition of extra dependencies. I sometimes feel
> (probably wrongly) that if only a basic bit of functionality is needed
> then it's easier to have
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:09:31AM +0200, Davide Cesari wrote:
>
> On 30/09/2012 23:41, phil rosenberg wrote:
> > Hi Alan
> > I was just considering that one negative brought up regarding supporting
> > shapefiles was the addition of extra dependencies. I sometimes feel
> > (probably wrongly) that
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 09:51:38AM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> I don't have AGG currently so haven't tested that (I'll try later).
> The basic backend (backend=0) is fine (see attached screenshot). The
> problems are with the wxGraphicsContext backend (backend=1).
Sorry backend=2
On 2012-09-30 14:41-0700 phil rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Alan
> I was just considering that one negative brought up regarding supporting
> shapefiles was the addition of extra dependencies. I sometimes feel (probably
> wrongly) that if only a basic bit of functionality is needed then it's easier
> t
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:09:31AM +0200, Davide Cesari wrote:
>> [...]Hello to everybody,
>> please note that shapelib is part of the OSGEO4W installation,
>>
>> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/
>>
>> which is currently the official and supported way to install shapelib
>> (and to build
