Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>
> 3'. I am going to encourage everybody to use the lesson 3 approach for
> further major
> developments. This immediately applies to both Arjen (currently working on a
> fortran
> binding rewrite)
Hi Arjen:
On 2015-04-15 07:00- Arjen Markus wrote:
> [...] That [quick release cycles, pushes of major changes only in
the first part of the release cycle] seems a wise approach. I can not
predict whether I will be able to get the Fortran bindings reorganised
as we planned before that time, b
Hi Alan,
Well, I feel comfortable with Cygwin, and from the point of using it, also with
MinGW (and to a lesser extent MSYS). Installing new stuff on MinGW is a bit of
a pain, as there is not a single point of entry like with Cygwin. I have,
however, hardly any experience with MinGW-w64/MSYS2
Hi Arjen:
On 2015-04-15 12:16- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Well, I feel comfortable with Cygwin, and from the point of using
it, also with MinGW (and to a lesser extent MSYS). Installing new
stuff on MinGW is a bit of a pain, as there is not a single point of
entry like with Cygwin. I have, however
Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>
> > Well, I feel comfortable with Cygwin, and from the point of using
> it, also with MinGW (and to a lesser extent MSYS). Installing new stuff on
> MinGW is
> a bit of a pain, as there is not a sin
