On 05/13/2015 05:50 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> Hi Hazen:
>
> I have reviewed plfill.c, and the returned intersection from
> notcrossed is only used when status is zero. So I have (commit ID =
> b916d4b) considerably simplified noncrossed to do the PLINT
> transformation of the intersection and r
On 05/14/2015 11:42 AM, Hazen Babcock wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 05:50 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hazen:
>>
>> I have reviewed plfill.c, and the returned intersection from
>> notcrossed is only used when status is zero. So I have (commit ID =
>> b916d4b) considerably simplified noncrossed to do
Alan,One potential downside of the newer Direct2D/DirectWrite APIs is that they aren't supported on Windows XP. I know I have users of my application still using XP. I can't tell without some more research, but I think Windows 10 even supports GDI/GDI+.If the case for using Direct2D/DirectWrite i
The code that I currently have uses GDI, so we can start from there.
> On May 14, 2015, at 11:51 AM, hexa...@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Alan,
>
> One potential downside of the newer Direct2D/DirectWrite APIs is that they
> aren't supported on Windows XP. I know I have users of my application sti
On 2015-05-14 11:57-0400 Jim Dishaw wrote:
> The code that I currently have uses GDI, so we can start from there.
Sounds good.
Alan
__
Alan W. Irwin
Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca)
On 2015-05-14 15:51- hexa...@comcast.net wrote:
> Alan,
>
> One potential downside of the newer Direct2D/DirectWrite APIs is that they
> aren't supported on Windows XP. I know I have users of my
> application still using XP. I can't tell without some more research, but I
> think Windows 10
Alan, That makes sense to me. I can see how the configure/build time checks make sense to affect which support to attempt compile-in. E.g. if one were building with an older compiler on an XP host, you wouldn't want to try to link in Direct2D support. OTOH, what I actually had in mind was runtim