On 2016-01-19 07:50- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 4:47 AM
>> To: PLplot development list
>> Subject: [Plplot-devel] Redacted dimension arguments
>> ..., I came up
I'm perhaps less keen on the idea of using the minimum dimension.
Passing unequal sized arrays is clearly and error and so I think we
should flag it is such is the loudest way possible so the user can fix
it. I think the times when I have often got this wrong are off by one
cases and getting x and
I just realised I forgot one thing
There isn't a standard 2D container in C++, so you have to create a
vector of vectors, something like
std::vector> myMatrix;
However a lot of people don't like this as it is generally considered
rather slow. So I think there are lots of other things people use
i
Oh and a final point. We should think carefully before removing the
forms where we pass in a raw pointer and a number of elements. There
are cases where only a raw pointer will do, such as when the array
class doesn't have a size method or the array class uses () instead of
[] for element access. A
On 2016-01-19 12:32- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> I'm perhaps less keen on the idea of using the minimum dimension.
> Passing unequal sized arrays is clearly and error and so I think we
> should flag it is such is the loudest way possible so the user can fix
> it. I think the times when I have ofte
On 2016-01-19 13:07- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> Oh and a final point. We should think carefully before removing the
> forms where we pass in a raw pointer and a number of elements.
My own feeling is the advantages of full-featured arrays outweigh the
simplicity (but also dangers) of C-style arra
