Hi Everybody,
I am looking into the error reported in Launchpad (Ubuntu's bug
tracking tool) in this link
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plplot/+bug/259058
It will be great if someone could comment on that bug as to whether it
is a known issue or any proposed suggestions to fix
On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
Jerry,
I'm not quite sure what your latest commit is intended to do? It
certainly doesn't reproduce the C results for me.
The plplot time functions use 0.0 to represent January 1, 1970.
This is
the usual unix convention for the epoch in C
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML docs at http://plplot.sourceforge.net/docbook-manual/plplot-
html-5.9.0/ do not contain a mention of plimage (or plimagefr which I
think is new). However, the PDF version at http://
Thanks, Hez.
Jerrhy
On Aug 18, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML docs at http://plplot.sourceforge.net/docbook-manual/plplot-
html-5.9.0/ do not contain a mention of plimage (or plimagefr which I
think is new).
On Aug 18, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2008-08-18 16:04-0700 Jerry wrote:
On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
Jerry,
I'm not quite sure what your latest commit is intended to do? It
certainly doesn't reproduce the C results for me.
The plplot time functions use
On 2008-08-18 20:17-0700 Jerry wrote:
As I see it, the first thing that has to be reckoned with is why x29c.c is
mislabeling the axis on OS X. I've pasted a screen shot as a PDF but I
suppose it won't survive the list mail process.
No, it got attached fine, but its first label is 1970-01-14
On 2008-08-18 21:32-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2008-08-18 20:17-0700 Jerry wrote:
As I see it, the first thing that has to be reckoned with is why x29c.c is
mislabeling the axis on OS X. I've pasted a screen shot as a PDF but I
suppose it won't survive the list mail process.
No, it got
