On 2010-01-03 11:01-0800 David MacMahon wrote:
> Is the svn
> repository on SourceForge the canonical repository for PLplot?
Yes. Note, we have the usual tags, branches, and trunk organization there
so use "svn checkout
https://plplot.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/plplot/trunk"; to get the latest
On Jan 2, 2010, at 14:12 , Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> I suggest you go ahead
> and make a mixed precision library wrapper for your own needs for a
> start;
> see how that goes; and then get back to us on the plplot-devel
> mailing list
> to discuss whether the overall general usefulness of this i
On 2010-01-02 12:17-0800 David MacMahon wrote:
> Hi, Alan,
>
> Thanks for confirming that for me.
>
> On Jan 2, 2010, at 8:13 , Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> I would suggest you use the default (double precision) build
>> (with appropriate casts of that part of your data that is single-precision
>> to
Hi, Alan,
Thanks for confirming that for me.
On Jan 2, 2010, at 8:13 , Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> I would suggest you use the default (double precision) build
> (with appropriate casts of that part of your data that is single-
> precision
> to double precision) since the default build is the one th
On 2010-01-02 00:32-0800 David MacMahon wrote:
> It seems that PLplot can be built and installed using single
> precision floats (libplplotf.*) and/or double precision floats
> (libplplotd.*), but it seems like any one executable should not link
> to both of these libraries. In other words, if on
It seems that PLplot can be built and installed using single
precision floats (libplplotf.*) and/or double precision floats
(libplplotd.*), but it seems like any one executable should not link
to both of these libraries. In other words, if one wants to plot
both single and double precision
