Hi Alan,
I am confident that CMake is a decent build system. I will give it a try at
some point.
Please do keep me up to date about the outcome of the discussion among the core
developers of whether or not you’ll be moving to Github.
If it is decided to do so, I will gladly help out with the c
On 2016-09-23 12:30-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Note, a decade-old build system normally accumulates a lot of cruft
> and PLplot is no exception in that regard. So reducing that cruft and
> also learning to take advantage of modern CMake facilities requires a
> substantial amount of on-going main
On 2016-09-23 15:30+0100 Tom Schoonjans wrote:
> Hello once again,
>
> Travis-CI and Appveyor are not part of Github, but are separate companies in
> their own right. They are just (popular) examples of companies that make use
> of the webhook and integration possibilities that are offered by Gi
Hello once again,
Travis-CI and Appveyor are not part of Github, but are separate companies in
their own right. They are just (popular) examples of companies that make use of
the webhook and integration possibilities that are offered by Github. A list of
similar companies can be found here: htt
Hi Tom:
On 2016-09-22 13:54+0100 Tom Schoonjans wrote:
>
[Hazen said]
>> I am not familiar with Travis-CI or AppVeyor but they sound interesting.
>
> Nowadays Continuous Integration is a standard tool for automated testing and
> building nightly releases. With Travis-CI and AppVeyor you can easi
